On Freedom
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between July 1 - July 4, 2025
10%
Flag icon
Slavery was conceived of as negative freedom: a right of the slaveowner to own property, with which the government was not to interfere.
10%
Flag icon
the right to health care. But we will only achieve that if we manage something that the Founders did not: recognizing other bodies as equally human.
10%
Flag icon
We are neither gods nor objects. We are humans who can become sovereign. Freedom is neither the lack nor the acceptance of constraints, but rather the use of them.
11%
Flag icon
Sovereignty has to do with the body, with what we learn to do. It also has to do with the past, with the world we inherit. “The past and the future,” says Weil, “are man’s only treasures.”
11%
Flag icon
Hitler wanted Ukraine as Lebensraum, living space.
11%
Flag icon
When we torture or humiliate a body, we further objectify it. After the body has been degraded and the person humiliated, the killer finds the work easier to bear. Some enjoy it.
11%
Flag icon
Edith Stein.
11%
Flag icon
Equal dignity is easy to grant in theory. But how do we recognize others in practice? Tending the wrecked bodies of men wounded at the front, Stein found that we acknowledge others through the Leib.
11%
Flag icon
We have to see the bodies of others as subjects, because otherwise we cannot see ourselves as subjects. And if we fail to do that, we cannot be free.
12%
Flag icon
And America has become a flawed republic threatened by oligarchy and fascism for many reasons, but negative freedom is among them.
12%
Flag icon
Public goods like swimming pools passed to the private sector, where membership rules could informally enforce prejudice.
12%
Flag icon
Having been excluded from swimming pools, Black kids were less likely to learn to swim than white kids. And so white kids were instructed that Black bodies were not buoyant. This was “common knowledge.”
13%
Flag icon
If we expect people to accept the institutions into which they were born, on the basis of an agreement that is largely (or totally) fictional, how can that be generative of freedom?
13%
Flag icon
Heidegger and the existentialists were part (phenomenology),
13%
Flag icon
Regulating emotions is a step toward the evaluation that enables freedom.
14%
Flag icon
The occupations that are most relevant to freedom are the caregivers: the elementary school teachers, the preschool teachers, the childcare workers. A society concerned with freedom would respect such people and pay them well.
14%
Flag icon
Freedom is not about being right, which is elusive, but about trying to do right.
15%
Flag icon
we accept that “everything is shit,” if nothing is any better than anything else, we have no basis for sovereign choices,
15%
Flag icon
Havel’s essay “The Power of the Powerless,” a profound meditation on freedom.
15%
Flag icon
Freedom requires a positive presence, not a malign neglect.
15%
Flag icon
Free people are predictable to themselves but unpredictable to authorities and machines. Unfree people are unpredictable to themselves and predictable to rulers.
15%
Flag icon
Normalization, by contrast, was a politics of entropy, a decomposition. Life was pre-death.
16%
Flag icon
“The Power of the Powerless” was a guide to the lure of unfreedom and a suggestion of how to become less probable.
17%
Flag icon
You feel free when your prior choices make sense of a moment. Your actions are then predictable to you, though unpredictable to the world.
18%
Flag icon
“Accident,” but it was accident followed by commitment.
18%
Flag icon
Shakespeare has Hamlet say: “Where joy most revels, grief doth most lament / Grief joys, joy grieves, on slender accident.”
20%
Flag icon
An important Russian actor in the campaigns of 2014 and 2016 was Yevgeny Prigozhin, who ran Russia’s Internet Research Agency. Prigozhin also directed a private military company called Wagner.
20%
Flag icon
Things get our attention, but we no longer pay attention.
21%
Flag icon
“We all have our own values. Live in truth. Maybe you want to play the guitar. Learn to play the guitar. Start a band.”
21%
Flag icon
Freedom is positive; it needs the vivifying world of values. If we have no purpose, we serve someone else’s, or we serve a purposeless machine.
22%
Flag icon
Lovelace (1815–52) long ago called a “calculus of the nervous system.” Their dread superpower is to predictify, to dominate people by making them predictable as individuals and classifiable as groups.
22%
Flag icon
Intermittent reinforcement is the second brain hack. It depends on experimental isolation—if the animal has company, the device is less beguiling.
22%
Flag icon
communists shifted to zero values and intermittent reinforcement.
22%
Flag icon
Simone Weil, “what we get is icy tumult.” The cold stream of manipulation erodes us into caricatures of ourselves.
23%
Flag icon
This is cognitive dissonance, the fifth and final brain hack, the machine’s coup de grâce. We use what is left of our human reason to defend actions that were based on an alien one.
24%
Flag icon
If we knew that we had access to health care and a retirement pension, we would live more interesting lives.
24%
Flag icon
For middle-class people, dependence on private health care makes it difficult to change jobs.
24%
Flag icon
This drastic restraint on mobility—and thus on freedom—is, sadly, taken for granted in the United States.
24%
Flag icon
The first three forms of freedom—sovereignty, unpredictability, and mobility—should be present throughout our lives. There is nevertheless an order of development. In childhood, we attain sovereignty, with the help of others; in youth, we sustain unpredictability as we realize our own combinations of values. As we become adults, we need somewhere to go and the ability to get there.
25%
Flag icon
In 1946 segregation in interstate travel became illegal, in theory. Nothing much changed in practice.
26%
Flag icon
Lebensraum, living space. This was a kind of imperial mobility: the world was covered by empire; Germans should impose their own.
28%
Flag icon
the word freedom in American English came to mean little more than the privilege of a few wealthy Americans not to pay taxes, the power of a few oligarchs to shape the discourse, and the unequal application of criminal law.
28%
Flag icon
prison gerrymandering. Incarcerated people are counted as residents for the purposes of deciding how many elected representatives a given district will have.
28%
Flag icon
Urban Americans are extracted from cities where they would have voted and placed in the exurbs or countryside where their bodies magnify the voting power of others—very
28%
Flag icon
this way, not only are the incarcerated denied a voice, but their voice is taken by others—and precisely by those who have an incentive to see prisons as a source of jobs and of political power.
28%
Flag icon
redlining, which mutated into new forms after housing discrimination as such was later banned.
28%
Flag icon
In positive freedom, we recognize that there are many good things, and we try to bring them together.
28%
Flag icon
Racism stops us from being pluralists and so prevents us from being free.
29%
Flag icon
Where once disease was a tool of empire, now drugs have become a means of self-oppression. Where once guns allowed men to tame a frontier, now they are instruments of self-annihilation. Postimperial immobility is not simply personal tragedy but the birth of tyranny.
30%
Flag icon
The worst possible analysis prevailed: the collapse of the USSR was somehow the fault of the welfare state.