A World Without Men: An Analysis of an All-Female Economy

by Aaron Clarey

This not only cements a negative opinion of all men at all times, but ensures anytime a guy approaches a gal he is greeted with distrust, disdain, skepticism, even derision or mockery (commonly referred to as “bitch shields”) rather than kindness, femininity, and sweetness. This has contributed tremendously to the decay in male-female relations today and a War of the Sexes that makes the Soviet era cold war look friendly.

Human genome studies show only 40% of men have bred, compared to 80% of women. These numbers vary significantly over human history and vary based on the study (and there is the fact that historically men have been killed in war, enslaved, etc., while other men ran harems). But it shows when given a choice, women were only interested in a minority of men when it came to arguably the most important biological decision they could make – who to breed with.

The infamous OK Cupid poll showed women found 80% of men unattractive. Other reports show women swipe on men’s profiles only 3-14% of the time. Women are 16 times more likely to match on dating apps than men are. And if you still aren’t convinced, look at any “Tinder Insights” chart (see right) and you can visually see just how little interest women have in men.

Men may prefer Ferrari’s without bumper stickers, women don’t care.

Divorce has always been a tell-tale sign of women’s lackadaisical interest in men. Even after taking vows in front of their presumed “love of their life,” women still initiate divorce about 75% of the time. This further proves women’s interest in men is not only conditional, but fickle and fleeting.

Men are the Les Grossman’s of society, not the nutless monkeys.

never have women in general been convinced that gaps in performances between them and men have been due to choices and efforts made on their part. It always has to be discrimination, “the patriarchy,” or sexism. And since there is no intellectual honesty on their part to take agency and ownership in their decisions, all efforts to critically assess the cause of these disparities are a waste of time, even if it would tangibly help women.

But there is also an undeniable component of “shutting down,” where if men see nothing to gain from participating in society, they will go into a hibernation or stasis to conserve energy until there is reason to invest. But regardless of how men come to this point of inaction, it’s still inaction,

resulting in absolutely zero societal participation, as well as a wasted, tortured life. One where men simply exist, doing only the bare minimum to keep themselves alive, where their only motivation in life is to avoid pain rather than achieve greatness or pleasure.