Kindle Notes & Highlights
by
C.H. Klotz
Read between
September 5 - September 15, 2023
The endeavour of this book is to bring thoughtful voices together to sing as one choir. The diversity of these voices that harmonise may allow others to hear the music. Over the last three years solo voices have too often been drowned out of the discourse.
One difficult thing about our shared COVID experience is that it wasn’t really shared, not just because of isolation but because vast numbers of people have had no voice. We’ve heard about the struggles of teachers and nurses, of government workers afraid to return to work, but what about the Vietnamese family who owned the dry cleaner in one of those shuttered office buildings? What about the 70-year-old crossing guard who suddenly had nothing to wake up for, or the drywaller who lost his business during the shutdown of construction? Where did we hear about their suicides and collapse, what
...more
one useful source was simply Health Canada’s website, where the curve of hospitalizations and deaths had always been thickest for those already at the end of life. Once I learned from the CDC’s own reckoning that more than 96 per cent of COVID deaths occurred among people with three co-morbidities, I grew a little disdainful of my neighbours riding mountain bikes with masks on.
COVID was, of course, a serious disease for a few, but was best considered a hastener not a killer.
had watched everyone learn to hate each other in the name of caring, everyone denying life in the name of living,
I shook hands with all kinds of people, hugged a big drunk in Carhartt overalls, wandered around and chatted. Met a mother whose son couldn’t play hockey on his team without being vaccinated, who died the morning after inoculation. The gym owner who lost his business, his house, his income, deemed inessential by people who still enjoyed the novelty of working at home in their pyjamas. These people who should be heard, the mute and inglorious – they weren’t there just out of bitterness, they were there to feel connection. They were protesting, they had complaints, but they were there to
...more
After the clinical trial report was published in the New England Journal of Medicine, we noticed several inconsistencies; AstraZeneca states that they follow all adverse events for 730 days. I last heard from them on day 60. That is well over two years of critical safety data gone. AstraZeneca also states that the individuals who didn’t get a second dose chose to forego getting the second dose. AstraZeneca instructed the test clinic that I not get a second dose.
What would have happened had these respected researchers been able to share their findings openly? Had their clinical guidance been published in notable journals, press releases issued, and guidance provided via the CDC’s COCA? Had their emergency care teams been equipped with the tools necessary to identify and treat these conditions urgently, would these mothers, fathers, sons, and daughters be back to work, and others still be alive? Where would all of those who were injured after me be today had this scientific censorship not taken place?
We reached out to mainstream media reporters and were told time and time again that they could not report on COVID vaccine injuries. Given that the United States government issued PR contracts with news agencies totaling more than $1-billion to promote the COVID vaccines, it is no surprise that there has been a complete block on stories that contradict the “safe and effective” narrative.
Within 24 hours of this first press conference we experienced our first major censorship from big tech. Facebook shut down our first support group. Then, without notice Facebook shut down a second support group. We lost contact with close to 4,000 people injured by COVID vaccines in just one short week. The war against the injured had begun, merely because we finally spoke loud enough that someone might hear our cries for help.
I later learned about a project funded by the Bill Gates foundation called the Virality Project. This project provided briefings to the White House on all information regarding COVID that may sway public opinion. Little did we know, the Virality Project was logging our every move after Senator Johnson’s press conference. They specifically logged Senator Johnson’s press conference, the media’s response to the conference, and even my own involvement in a small news story that discussed my work with Senator Mike Lee, who was asking the FDA pointed questions about the clinical trials. This
...more
We are forced to ask why Facebook’s fact-checkers, at best writers with a degree in communications, are empowered to overrule the opinions and conclusions of experienced academics working through the BMJ?
A friend once told me, “You might never touch a million people but you might touch that one, who will touch a million.” Never underestimate the power of your voice. Never shut-up, never give up. Keep talking, keep sharing these stories, keep demanding better.
Along with my colleague Brian Tyson, in the first year and a half of the pandemic, we successfully treated well over 7,000 patients and today over 20,000 patients. From my experience, let me state it boldly: no one needs to die from COVID. No one should die from COVID. COVID is a treatable disease. If we treat COVID early, no one dies. Let me repeat: If we treat COVID early, no one dies.
All the patients we treated early, and who adhered to our treatments, lived. They were mostly adults with comorbidities. Sometimes, we treated elderly people, in their eighties or nineties. We treated only a few children, as they rarely develop a severe disease.
my perspective today on COVID vaccination has changed. I personally witnessed too many vaccine injuries—some fatal. I have seen the VAERS voluntary reporting data. I have read estimates on the actual numbers of adverse events. The data are clear: these are the most unsafe vaccines in the history of medicine.
many eminent public health professionals at the tops of their fields have stepped forward to offer sane, traditional, contagion-control measures.
In “untangling the true from the false,” untrained media personnel have censored the following prominent professors and researchers with outstanding publication histories[37] and conflict-of-interest-free credentials. Further information can be found at his or her Google Scholar publication record: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, epidemiologist, Stanford University Dr. Sunetra Gupta, infectious disease epidemiologist, Oxford Univ. Dr. Martin Kulldorff, epidemiologist, Harvard Dr. Robert W. Malone, inventor of mRNA technology platform Dr. Peter A. McCullough, former Vice-Chair Int. Med., Baylor Univ. Dr.
...more
Indeed, the very foundation of democracy is that public wisdom should be consulted and given its head in self-rule. The public has the constitutional right to full information to form and express its own conclusions and does not need a coordinated TNI to corral and contain it.
Perhaps the TrialSiteNews staff has said it best: “We think that disallowing good-faith medical information because the public can’t be presumed to properly weigh claims is infantilizing said public, along with dismantling the free speech culture that perhaps peaked in the 20th Century. The efforts now underway to completely suppress positive data associated with early-onset treatment prospects such as ivermectin or the squelching of any discussion of vaccine safety issues is completely unacceptable in a civilized, democratic market-based society. Those perpetuating such offenses are in fact
...more
In the majority opinion, Justice Felix Frankfurter wrote that the First Amendment: … rests on the assumption that the widest possible dissemination of information from diverse and antagonistic sources is essential to the welfare of the public, that a free press is a condition of a free society.
Freedom to publish means freedom for all, and not for some. Freedom to publish is guaranteed by the Constitution, but freedom to combine to keep others from publishing is not. Freedom of the press from governmental interference under the First Amendment does not sanction repression of that freedom by private interests.
“TNI members agreed in early 2020 that their ‘ground-breaking collaboration’ would target online news relating to COVID-19 and that TNI members would ‘work together to … ensure [that] harmful disinformation myths are stopped in their tracks’”[9] and “jointly [combat] fraud and misinformation about the virus.”[10] These efforts included the development of a “shared early warning system of rapid alerts” to quickly identify and remove ‘disinformation.’[11]
and ‘Twitter files’ documents, news reports, and documents received through Freedom of Information Act requests that have shown evidence of numerous and ongoing White House communications with Facebook, Twitter, and Google about how to take action against ‘misinformation’ related to COVID-19. It would therefore not be inaccurate to say that, as taxpayers, we are paying for our own censorship.
It takes seven to 10 years for a normal vaccine to be tested for safety before it’s put into the arms of people. The clinical trial only lasted 28 days, and I knew something was fishy there. I came to the conclusion that the FDA didn’t really look at this clinical trial data. They rushed it through due to political pressure. Maybe, straight up bribes; we don’t know. But what we do know is that this should never have been approved.
The millennial age group saw 61,000 deaths, excess deaths in a one year time frame, correlated with an acceleration in the mandates and the boosters in the fall of 2021.
But then in 2021, the stats people expected went off the rails. The CEO of the One American Insurance Company publicly disclosed that during the third and fourth quarters of 2021, death in people of working age, that is 18 to 64 was 40% higher than it was before the pandemic. Significantly, the majority of the deaths were not attributed to COVID.”
Doctor Ryan Cole saw in his practice biopsy cancer shooting up in 2022. He’s what I call a stock-picker of doctors. He saw a trend. That’s what I do for a living; notice trend changes and pattern recognition. Dr. Cole didn’t need someone from the CDC or FDA to tell him something was wrong. He figured it out early and said this is a signal. That’s why he’s been such a critical voice in all this. Dr. Robert Malone also, these are people that can think by themselves.
I suspect undue influence and strong-arming from the intelligence agencies for these guys to censor, because what they said initially about what they wanted to do with their companies is not what they’re doing now. They pulled a 180-degree from their original promises to democratize the Internet. Now they’ve become the primary instrument of control, of authoritarian and totalitarian control.
trials. A conventional vaccine typically takes about 10 years to get to market. This timeframe was reduced to less than a year in the context of the COVID-19 injectable products.
It has been very difficult for me to understand how anybody could make claims of safety with regard to these products, when there simply wasn’t enough time to make this assessment. Genuine safety testing was not possible. That is a fact. Furthermore, rather than a two-year follow up of the patients in the trial, in the case of the Pfizer phase III clinical trial, the placebo participants were unblinded and injected with the product, so the placebo group was intentionally lost. This means that any ongoing trial or experimental data being collected would be null and void - it’s lost without a
...more
As an aside, I really would like to know how many people of the billions who have been injected with these products knew that they were being injected with something that wasn’t a traditional vaccine? I can pretty much guarantee that most people didn’t know this.
Yes, just one month after the roll-out began on December 17th, 2020. We had almost 90,000 reports in VAERS spread across many age groups, and almost 700 deaths in the context of just 3 products: the COVID Moderna, Pfizer and Janssen products. The last time a product went onto the market and killed more than 50 people, that product was pulled.
Self-censorship during the COVID pandemic has taken many forms. As a medical professional and scientist, one might assume that I’m immune to such pitfalls, but the opposite is true. Facing fear of professional repercussions, I have downplayed and withheld discussing valid scientific concerns publicly. Other medical professionals have done the same, thus stifling productive debate, preventing critical variables from being evaluated, and creating the illusion of scientific consensus where one may have never existed.
My experience as a doctor has taught me that novel medications often fail to deliver on their optimistic promises and it is not until later that we learn they are more harmful or less beneficial than initially believed.
Generations of medical school students have been told: “Half of what we taught you is wrong; the only problem is we don’t know which half.” The point is that no one, not even the world’s top medical scientists, can determine absolute truth. Yet, fact-checkers were tasked with just this, and in their effort to do so they confused confident expert opinion for facts, when expert opinions are not facts. Indeed, even a consensus of medical experts is not a fact.
for virtually every person on the planet,
Even the mighty Joe Rogan faltered briefly. Early in the pandemic he interviewed Dr. Michael Osterholm – who downplayed risk stratification, suggesting all of us were vulnerable. It was an unfortunate misstep for Rogan but he has since redeemed himself many times over and he is one of the few who changed course based on clear-headed analysis.
warned of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s history: dissembling and playing politics with pathogens and the humans they affect. It was based on my experience reporting on Fauci during the AIDS crisis. I had come away from that story traumatized by the death count and the callousness, ego and incompetence of the man running the response.
Vaccine efficacy failure and adverse reactions from the shot plus panic-driven lockdown policies killed people. That’s a fact. The soaring mental health crisis born of loneliness and the long-term psychic damage of crushing government oppression and betrayal are played out every day now in news
My interview subject was soon to die of AIDS after surviving for 11 years. Michael Callen, whom I’d known since the 80s had become an historic figure in the people with aids movement and knew his time was up. Facing the end, his big questions weren’t about the meaning of life and death but rather about the moral landscape inhabited by Tony Fauci. He recalled a desperate meeting at the NIH a few years before. Michael and his doctor begged Fauci to smooth the way for Bactrim – a simple sulpha drug being used off-label successfully to stave off a catastrophic pneumonia that often meant the end.
...more
I was a high profile TV reporter back then and booked an interview with Fauci to ask him myself – why wouldn’t he tell AIDS clinicians about the success with Bactrim? I was aggressive and Fauci was, well, Fauci – a man accomplished at spinning while taking offense at even being asked. I persisted and it was quite a showdown. Even though it is said that thousands of AIDS patients died as a result of the two-year delay, Fauci wouldn’t acknowledge his mistake. But he did reveal something about his nature that’s been on full display during the pandemic; a loose relationship with the truth and an
...more
Naomi Wolf calls it The War Against the Human and I think she is correct.
When COVID hit, I noticed that the guidelines coming out of the CDC and NIH did not seem consistent with my knowledge of viruses, on many levels. Social distancing and recommendations to stay indoors did not make sense. School closures did not make sense. Masking requirements and plexiglass dividers did not make sense. The types of businesses allowed to remain open and those required to close did not make sense. The lack of basic public health guidelines for overall healthy living and disease prevention did not make sense. Most of all, the treatment of patients in the hospitals did not make
...more
As a board-certified pathologist, I have spent my career making observations about patterns and reporting my findings. My job is to tell the truth about what I see and I have practiced medicine by the maxim that “the cells don’t lie.” I never could have anticipated the ways that sharing these observations would be twisted and construed as “mis-, dis-, and mal- information” by scientific “authorities,” government agencies, and numerous media outlets.
As more and more clinics of all specialties were gobbled up by large hospital systems, we focused on serving independent practices. These groups shared our values that medical care should be primarily about the relationship between the patient and their clinician, and there should not be multiple levels of bureaucracy dictating the type of care a patient should receive.
I had done one year of PhD research in virology and immunology, in addition to having had training in those areas during medical school and residency, so I had an excellent background for understanding viral mechanisms and pathophysiology. Almost immediately, I had questions and concerns about the approach toward the illness, as directed by the medical “authorities” and communicated to the public through the mainstream media. The approach they were taking did not seem to line up with my observations and understanding of this type of virus.
I continued to observe and study the patterns of spread, diagnosis, and treatment of COVID. I noticed that the guidelines coming out of the CDC and NIH did not seem consistent with my knowledge of viruses, on many levels.
I was concerned from the first discussions about vaccine development. I understood that these vaccines would be ineffective and potentially harmful because of the rapidly mutating nature of coronaviruses. Soon after the vaccine roll-out I began to see disturbing trends in the types of cancers and infections I was seeing under the microscope in my lab. This is the very nature of scientific discovery – to make truthful observations and study this through rigorous and repeatable application of the scientific method. I have learned through this process that the truth is not always appreciated.
The COVID pandemic has exposed the deep-seated flaws in our medical system, our public health institutions, and in our democracy as a whole. It has exposed the private special interests that dictate government policy, and the ties to media that reinforce that message from the government. As I observe the larger patterns, we are now in a fight for our very freedoms – our freedom from the influence of state-controlled media, our freedom of bodily autonomy and self-expression, our freedom of speech, and our freedom to find truth.
