The Interface Effect
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between February 28 - March 10, 2017
2%
Flag icon
Interfaces are not things, but rather processes that effect a result of whatever kind.
8%
Flag icon
Manovich would rather make the argument that new media are first and foremost aesthetic objects.
8%
Flag icon
Today all media are a question of synecdoche (scaling a part for the whole), not indexicality (pointing from here to there).
10%
Flag icon
The world no longer indicates to us what it is. We indicate ourselves to it, and in doing so the world materializes in our image.
12%
Flag icon
For Kittler and McLuhan alike, media mean hypomnesis. They define media via the externalization of man into objects.
13%
Flag icon
A philosophy of mediation will tend to proliferate multiplicity; a philosophy of media will tend to agglomerate difference into reified objects.
16%
Flag icon
The machine is an ethic because it is premised on the notion that objects are subject to definition and manipulation according to a set of principles for action.
16%
Flag icon
And this is the interface effect again, only in different language: the computer is not an object, or a creator of objects, it is a process or active threshold mediating between two states.
21%
Flag icon
Romanticism and cybernetic systems theory: play today is a synthesis of these two influences.