Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming
Rate it:
Open Preview
10%
Flag icon
The writer C. S. Lewis once characterized this style of argument: “The very lack of evidence is thus treated as evidence; the absence of smoke proves that the fire is very carefully hidden.”
18%
Flag icon
If this were a court of law, the jury would now have ruled the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. But science is not a courtroom, and environmental problems involve far more than science.
42%
Flag icon
If you believed in capitalism, you had to attack science, because science had revealed the hazards that capitalism had brought in its wake.
59%
Flag icon
for if science is about studying the world as it actually is—rather than as we wish it to be—then science will always have the potential to unsettle the status quo.
59%
Flag icon
those in power will always seek to control history, because whoever controls the past controls the present.
59%
Flag icon
Science was showing that Isaiah Berlin was right: liberty for wolves does indeed mean death to lambs.