The argument is this. First, Pascal confesses to metaphysical ignorance: Let us now speak according to natural lights. If there is a God, he is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts, nor limits, He has no affinity to us. We are therefore incapable of knowing either what He is, or if He is... Who then will blame the Christians for not being able to give a reason for their belief, since they profess a religion for which they cannot give a reason?
