More on this book
Community
Kindle Notes & Highlights
We looked at each other, for a long strange moment that I’ve never forgotten, actually, like two animals meeting at twilight, during which some clear, personable spark seemed to fly up through his eyes and I saw the creature he really was—and he, I believe, saw me. For an instant we were wired together and humming, like two engines on the same circuit.
animals or electricity? very nearly a mixed metaphor. seriously? Also would like to point out that engines aren't ON a circuit, but are comprised of them, so really should be "two circuits in the same engine."
a dreamlike sense of having failed him, as if I’d botched some vital fairy-tale task through clumsiness and ignorance.
so many flowery sentences that don't really say anything but it doesn't seem to matter as the floweriness and exposition (getting on with the story) is all that really seems to matter...
"a dreamlike sense of having failed him..." what the hell does that mean? Not believing you failed, but then perceiving some disappointment regardless? Why is that dreamlike? What does dreamlike mean in this context?
"...some vital fairy-tale task..." so is it vital or a fairy-tale, which either denotes unrealistic expectation or or an unreal task.
If you actually look at these sentences and pick them apart, they are incredibly... clumsy and ignorant.
the firemen and rescue people had rushed the building only minutes after I got out, and I still had hopes that someone had made it back in to rescue him—the
a detail not mentioned previously. the boy had been rushed off before this occurred. in reality people may recall certain details separately but in a story such should be recognized or the recollection revised and made complete so it doesn't sound as if the author/narrator is making it up as he goes. Plus, how come he didn't hope his mother could be saved? Who cares about this guy? He's no one!
memory of that heaped plate with the steam coming off it still ties my stomach in knots.
passages like this don't ring true. of course it may be a fact but he could claim the look of a sidewalk or an actual knot tied him in knots. it comes across as wordiness, unnecessary detail to lend emotional relevance where one is not required as if the author added these extra bits to make sentence or paragraph or current passage "thicker" though it would probably be fine without them.
stars both silvery and golden
you slipped away sometimes into 1850, a world of ticking clocks and creaking floorboards, copper pots and baskets of turnips and onions in the kitchen, candle flames leaning all to the left in the draft of an opened door and tall parlor windows billowing and swagged like ball gowns, cool quiet rooms where old things slept.
When I’d first come to Vegas,
Flashback! another Oops-I-forgot-to-mention moment. is there really any moment where this could have happened? I feel like we've had a day to day account of everything. And suddenly, there's this one moment he forgot to mention before cuz his story doesn't make sense without it so "I'll just plop this sucker in right here..." I hate when authors do this. Too lazy to add it in when it should have been. its cheating. Tartt is too lazy to do a proper re-write.
“Uniform Transfer to Minors.
Xandra’s friend Lisa (solicitous, following me around, voicing gentle but increasingly urgent concerns that “the family” be notified) had retreated to a corner at some point to dial the number I gave her—and got off the phone with such a look that it had elicited, from Xandra, the only laugh of the evening.
again lazy writing. I swear there's no room for this event to have occurred. narrator was pretty thorough when initially telling the account, hence the "at some point."