Permutation City
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between January 9 - January 18, 2023
37%
Flag icon
and on a good night, a strong enough sense of camaraderie, telepathy, synergy, could by the mutual consent of the crowd take over, melting away (for a moment) all personal barriers, mental and mock-physical, reconstructing audience and performers into a single organism: one hundred eyes, two hundred limbs, one giant neural net resonating with the memories, perceptions and emotions of all the people it had been.
38%
Flag icon
Peer had once asked himself: Was that kernel of invariants – and the more-or-less unbroken thread of memory – enough? Had David Hawthorne, by another name, achieved the immortality he’d paid for? Or had he died somewhere along the way?
47%
Flag icon
Of course, any sense of loss, or disorientation, could be dealt with, too, subtracted out … but where would the process of amputation end? Who would remain to enjoy the untroubled conscience he’d manufactured? Who’d sleep the sleep of the just in his bed?
76%
Flag icon
Immortality would have been meaningless, trapped in a “machine” with a finite number of possible states; in a finite time he would have exhausted the list of every possible thing he could be. Only the promise of eternal growth made sense of eternal life.
85%
Flag icon
Understanding exactly how far she could go was more than enough to rid her of any desire to take a single step in that direction.
99%
Flag icon
Maybe the time came, for everyone, when there was no way forward, no other choice but death. Maybe the Lambertians were right, maybe “infinity” was meaningless … and “immortality” was a mirage no human should aspire to.
Where was the line? Between self-transformation so great as to turn a longing for death into childlike wonder … and death itself, and the handing on of the joys and burdens he could no longer shoulder to someone new?