The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion
Rate it:
Open Preview
23%
Flag icon
WEIRD philosophers since Kant and Mill have mostly generated moral systems that are individualistic, rule-based, and universalist.
23%
Flag icon
govern a society of autonomous individuals.
23%
Flag icon
sociocentric morality,
23%
Flag icon
place the needs of groups and institutions first,
23%
Flag icon
You’ll have additional concerns,
23%
Flag icon
and you’ll need additional virtues to bind people together.
23%
Flag icon
let’s try to understand moral diversity first, before we judge other moralities.
23%
Flag icon
Richard Shweder’s
24%
Flag icon
ethics of autonomy, community, and divinity.
24%
Flag icon
ethic of community
24%
Flag icon
ethic of divinity
24%
Flag icon
The body is a temple, not a playground.
24%
Flag icon
Bhubaneswar,
24%
Flag icon
the capital city of Orissa,
25%
Flag icon
you do find the idea that high = good = pure = God whereas low = bad = dirty = animal quite widely.
25%
Flag icon
moral disgust
25%
Flag icon
low on this vertical dimension.
25%
Flag icon
The ethic of divinity lets us give voice to inchoate feelings of elevation and degradation—our sense of “higher” and “lower.” It gives us a way to condemn crass consumerism and mindless or trivialized sexuality.
26%
Flag icon
other moral intuitions latent within yourself.
26%
Flag icon
Moral matrices bind people together and blind them to the coherence, or even existence, of other matrices.
26%
Flag icon
more than one valid framework
27%
Flag icon
when David Hume was alive, he was fighting a three-way battle.
27%
Flag icon
ATTACK OF THE SYSTEMIZERS
27%
Flag icon
Autism
27%
Flag icon
Empathizing
27%
Flag icon
Systemizing
27%
Flag icon
a region of
27%
Flag icon
personality-space—the
28%
Flag icon
had Bentham been alive today, “it is likely he would have received the diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome.”
28%
Flag icon
That would be an ad hominem argument, a logical error, and a mean thing to say.
28%
Flag icon
in psychology our goal is descriptive.
28%
Flag icon
The True Taste restaurant, serving up a one-receptor morality.
29%
Flag icon
the original triggers of a module and its current triggers.
29%
Flag icon
Moral Foundations Theory.
30%
Flag icon
prewired—flexible and subject to change—rather than hardwired,
30%
Flag icon
Nature provides a first draft, which experience then revises. … “Built-in” does not mean unmalleable; it means “organized in advance of experience.”
31%
Flag icon
attachment theory,
31%
Flag icon
Robert Trivers published his theory of reciprocal altruism.
31%
Flag icon
“tit for tat.”
32%
Flag icon
The male mind appears to be innately tribal—that
32%
Flag icon
We are the descendants of successful tribalists,
32%
Flag icon
pecking orders
33%
Flag icon
authority should not be confused with power.
33%
Flag icon
“Authority Ranking.”
33%
Flag icon
more like those of a parent and child than those of a dictator and fearful underlings:
33%
Flag icon
legitimate asymmetries,
33%
Flag icon
the obligations of their station.
35%
Flag icon
Moral Foundations Questionnaire (MFQ),
37%
Flag icon
“What Makes People Vote Republican?”
37%
Flag icon
Emile Durkheim.
1 6 13