The First 90 Days: Proven Strategies for Getting Up to Speed Faster and Smarter
Rate it:
Open Preview
39%
Flag icon
Even if you’re sure you know what your boss expects, you should go back regularly to confirm and clarify.
41%
Flag icon
How does your boss like to communicate? How often? What kinds of decisions does he want to be involved in, and when can you make calls on your own?
42%
Flag icon
Your 90-day plan should be written, even if it consists only of bullet points. It should specify priorities and goals as well as milestones.
43%
Flag icon
You should typically devote the first block of 30 days to learning and building personal credibility.
43%
Flag icon
Set weekly goals for yourself, and establish a personal discipline of weekly evaluation and planning.
43%
Flag icon
Your key outputs at the end of the first 30 days will be a diagnosis of the situation, an identification of key priorities, and a plan for how you will spend the next 30 days.
43%
Flag icon
At the 60-day mark, your review meeting should focus on assessing your progress toward the goals of your plan for the previous 30 days. You should also discuss what you plan to achieve in the next 30 days (that is, by the end of 90 days). Depending on the situation and your level in the organization, your goals at this juncture might include identifying the resources necessary to pursue major initiatives, fleshing out your initial assessments of strategy and structure, and presenting some early assessments of your team.
43%
Flag icon
The same five-conversation framework can help you build productive relationships with the people who report to you.
46%
Flag icon
be careful not to fall into the low-hanging fruit trap.
46%
Flag icon
your early wins must do double duty: they must help you build momentum in the short term and lay a foundation for achieving your longer-term business goals.
54%
Flag icon
The higher you climb in organizations, the more you take on the role of organizational architect, creating and aligning the key elements of the organizational system: the strategic direction, structure, core processes, and skill bases that provide the foundation for superior performance. No matter how charismatic you are as a leader, you cannot hope to do much if your organization is fundamentally out of alignment.
54%
Flag icon
assess alignment among these key elements.
54%
Flag icon
Making changes for change’s sake.
55%
Flag icon
Not adjusting for the STARS situation.
55%
Flag icon
Trying to restructure your way out of deeper problems.
55%
Flag icon
Specifically all four elements of organizational architecture need be aligned to work together.1 Strategic direction. The organization’s mission, vision, and strategy Structure. How people are organized in units and how their work is coordinated, measured, and incentivized Core processes. The systems used to add value through the processing of information and materials Skill bases. The capabilities of key groups of people in the organization
56%
Flag icon
Aligning an organization is like preparing for a long sailing trip. First, you need to be clear on whether your destination (the mission and goals) and your route (the strategy) are the right ones. Then you can figure out which boat you need (the structure), how to outfit it (the processes), and which mix of crew members is best (the skill bases). Throughout the journey, you keep an eye out for reefs that are not on the charts.
57%
Flag icon
Strategic direction encompasses mission, vision, and strategy. Mission is about what will be achieved, vision is about why people should feel motivated to perform at a high level, and strategy is about how resources should be allocated and decisions made to accomplish the mission. If you keep in mind the what, the why, and the how, you won’t get lost in debates about what a mission is, what a vision is, and what a strategy is.
57%
Flag icon
look at the logic behind the strategy to ensure that it makes sense overall.
57%
Flag icon
Start by looking at documents that describe your group’s mission, vision, and strategy.
57%
Flag icon
disassemble them into their components: markets, products, technologies, functional plans, and goals.
57%
Flag icon
Is the defined direction sufficient for what your unit needs to do in the next two or three years?
58%
Flag icon
SWOT—an acronym for strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats—was
60%
Flag icon
A good general rule is that decisions should be made by the people who have the most relevant knowledge, as long as their incentives encourage them to do what is best for the organization.
60%
Flag icon
The best predictor of what people will do is what they are incentivized to do.
60%
Flag icon
Reporting relationships help you observe and control the workings of your group, clarify responsibility, and encourage accountability.
60%
Flag icon
Core processes (often referred to as “systems”) enable your group to transform information, materials, and knowledge into value in the form of commercially viable products or services, new knowledge or ideas, productive relationships, or anything else the larger organization considers essential.
61%
Flag icon
Productivity. Does the process efficiently transform knowledge, materials, and labor into value? Timeliness. Does the process deliver the desired value in a timely manner? Reliability. Is the process sufficiently reliable, or does it break down too often? Quality. Does the process deliver value in a way that consistently meets required quality standards?
61%
Flag icon
When processes and structure mesh with each other, the good results are clear to see.
62%
Flag icon
Process analysis stimulates collective learning. It helps the entire group understand exactly who does what, within and between units or groups, to carry out a particular process.
63%
Flag icon
The most important decisions you make in your first 90 days will probably be about people.
63%
Flag icon
Criticizing the previous leadership. There is nothing to be gained by criticizing the people who led the organization before you arrived.
63%
Flag icon
Keeping the existing team too long.
64%
Flag icon
Not balancing stability and change.
64%
Flag icon
The key is to find the right balance between stability and change.
64%
Flag icon
Not working on organizational alignment and team development in parallel.
64%
Flag icon
Not holding on to the good people.
64%
Flag icon
you should look for ways to signal to the top performers that you recognize their capabilities.
64%
Flag icon
Undertaking team building before the core is in place.
64%
Flag icon
avoid explicit team-building activities until the team you want is largely in place.
64%
Flag icon
Making implementation-dependent decisions too early.
64%
Flag icon
you should judiciously defer making decisions until the core members are in place.
64%
Flag icon
Trying to do it all yourself.
97%
Flag icon
“Five Ways to Bungle a Job Change,” Harvard Business Review,
1 5 7 Next »