The Once and Future King (The Once and Future King, #1-4)
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between January 12 - February 4, 2018
52%
Flag icon
His Word was valuable to him not only because he was good, but also because he was bad. It is the bad people who need to have principles to restrain them.
60%
Flag icon
He had some news for Lancelot, which he told him in a whisper after dinner—but unfortunately he was a misogynist, and, like most people of that sort, he had the female failing of indiscretion.
Zena Hirsch
Lol
72%
Flag icon
Manners are only needed between people, to keep their empty affairs in working order. Manners makyth man, you know, not God.
73%
Flag icon
One explanation of Guenever, for what it is worth, is that she was what they used to call a “real” person. She was not the kind who can be fitted away safely under some label or other, as “loyal” or “disloyal” or “self-sacrificing” or “jealous.” Sometimes she was loyal and sometimes she was disloyal. She behaved like herself. And there must have been something in this self, some sincerity of heart, or she would not have held two people like Arthur and Lancelot. Like likes like, they say—and at least they are certain that her men were generous. She must have been generous too. It is difficult ...more
98%
Flag icon
Perhaps man was neither good nor bad, was only a machine in an insensate universe—his courage no more than a reflex to danger, like the automatic jump at the pin-prick. Perhaps there were no virtues, unless jumping at pin-pricks was a virtue, and humanity only a mechanical donkey led on by the iron carrot of love, through the pointless treadmill of reproduction.
99%
Flag icon
Perhaps, so long as people tried to possess things separately from each other, even honour and souls, there would be wars for ever.