The Coming Wave: AI, Power, and Our Future
Rate it:
Open Preview
Read between January 7 - February 6, 2025
15%
Flag icon
John McCarthy, who coined the term “artificial intelligence”:
15%
Flag icon
this is exactly what the scaling hypothesis predicts is coming and what we see the first signs of in today’s systems.
15%
Flag icon
I believe the debate about whether and when the Singularity will be achieved is a colossal red herring.
15%
Flag icon
Singularity,
16%
Flag icon
When AI could display humanlike conversational abilities for a lengthy period of time, such that a human interlocutor couldn’t tell they were speaking to a machine, the test would be passed: the AI, conversationally akin to a human, deemed intelligent.
16%
Flag icon
systems are already close to passing the Turing test.
16%
Flag icon
I think it will be done with a few minor human interventions within the next year, and probably fully autonomously within three to five years.
16%
Flag icon
The challenge is in advancing what AI developers call hierarchical planning, stitching multiple goals and subgoals and capabilities into a seamless process toward a singular end.
16%
Flag icon
AI and AGI are both parts of the everyday discussion, but we need a concept encapsulating a middle layer in which the Modern Turing Test is achieved but before systems display runaway “superintelligence.”
16%
Flag icon
Step back and consider what’s happening on the scale of a decade or a century. We really are at a turning point in the history of humanity.
17%
Flag icon
Extending the work of Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins, James Watson and Francis Crick discovered the structure of DNA,
17%
Flag icon
one of the world’s first biotech companies, Genentech, in 1976.
17%
Flag icon
One catalyst was the Human Genome Project. This was a thirteen-year, multibillion-dollar endeavor that gathered together thousands of scientists from across the world, in private and public institutions, with a single goal: unlocking the three billion letters of genetic information making up the human genome.
17%
Flag icon
CRISPR gene editing (the acronym stands for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats) is perhaps the best-known example of how we can directly intervene in genetics.
17%
Flag icon
Cas9, an enzyme acting as a pair of finely tuned DNA scissors,
17%
Flag icon
New techniques like Craspase, a CRISPR tool working with RNA and proteins rather than DNA, might allow for safer therapeutic interventions than conventional methods.
17%
Flag icon
The London DNA Foundry housed at Imperial College London claims it can create and test fifteen thousand different genetic designs in a single morning.
17%
Flag icon
enzymatic synthesis
17%
Flag icon
Stanford bioengineer Drew Endy, “Biology is the ultimate distributed manufacturing platform.”
19%
Flag icon
General-purpose technologies are accelerants. Invention sparks invention. Waves lay the ground for further scientific and technological experimentation, nudging open the doors of possibility.
19%
Flag icon
The future of agriculture, as John Deere sees it, involves autonomous tractors and combines that operate independently, following a field’s GPS coordinates and using an array of sensors to make automatic, real-time alterations to harvesting, maximizing yield and minimizing waste.
20%
Flag icon
It’s the computational equivalent of moving from a flat, black-and-white film into full color and three dimensions, unleashing a world of algorithmic possibility.
20%
Flag icon
Like AI and biotech, quantum computing helps speed up other elements of the wave.
21%
Flag icon
nuclear fusion.
21%
Flag icon
Fusion power involves the release of energy when isotopes of hydrogen collide and fuse to form helium, a process long considered the holy grail of energy production.
21%
Flag icon
inertial confinement, which involves compressing pellets of hydrogen-rich material with lasers and
21%
Flag icon
heating them to 100 million degrees to create a fleeting fusion reaction.
22%
Flag icon
One viable quantum computer could render the world’s entire encryption infrastructure redundant.
22%
Flag icon
physicist César Hidalgo argues that configurations of matter are significant because of the information they contain.
22%
Flag icon
The more powerful the computational base, the more tractable this becomes.
24%
Flag icon
A paradox of the coming wave is that its technologies are largely beyond our ability to comprehend at a granular level yet still within our ability to create and use.
24%
Flag icon
The challenger, a Western firm, London based, American owned, had just marched into an ancient, iconic, cherished game, literally put its flag in the turf, and obliterated the home team.
24%
Flag icon
The first driver has to do with what I experienced with AlphaGo: great power competition. Technological rivalry is a geopolitical reality. Indeed it always has been. Nations feel the existential need to keep up with their peers. Innovation is power. Second comes a global research ecosystem with its ingrained rituals rewarding open publication, curiosity, and the pursuit of new ideas at all costs. Then come the immense financial gains from technology and the urgent need to tackle our global social challenges. And the final driver is perhaps the most human of all: ego.
25%
Flag icon
Quantum computing is an area of notable Chinese expertise.
25%
Flag icon
“Even if we are not actually in an arms race, we must assume ‘they’ think we are, and therefore we must ourselves race to achieve a decisive strategic advantage since this new technological wave might completely rebalance global power.” This attitude becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
26%
Flag icon
myopic.
26%
Flag icon
Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India)
26%
Flag icon
Because these technologies are getting cheaper and simpler to use even as they get more powerful, more nations can engage at the frontier.
26%
Flag icon
Access to computation is likely the biggest bottleneck,
26%
Flag icon
India’s billion-strong biometric identification system, Aadhaar,
26%
Flag icon
there is no central authority controlling what technologies get developed, who does it, and for what purpose; technology is an orchestra with no conductor. Yet this single fact could end up being the most significant of the twenty-first century.
26%
Flag icon
Raw curiosity, the quest for truth, the importance of openness, evidence-based peer review—these are core values for scientific and technological research.
26%
Flag icon
Openness is science and technology’s cardinal ideology.
26%
Flag icon
Audrey Kurth Cronin calls “open technological innovation.” A global system of developing knowledge and technology is now so sprawling and open that it’s almost impossible to steer, govern, or, if need be, shut down.
26%
Flag icon
Junior researchers are especially liable to be judged—and hired—on their publication record, publicly viewable on platforms like Google Scholar.
26%
Flag icon
GitHub has 190 million repositories of code,
26%
Flag icon
Amazon’s R&D budget alone is $78 billion, which would be the ninth biggest in the world if it were a country.
26%
Flag icon
Alphabet, Apple, Huawei, Meta, and Microsoft all spend well in excess of $20 billion a year on R&D.
27%
Flag icon
Today’s world is optimized for curiosity, sharing, and research at a pace never seen before.
27%
Flag icon
And this, the potential for profit, is built on something even more long-lasting and robust: raw demand. People both want and need the fruits of technology.