Eve: How the Female Body Drove 200 Million Years of Human Evolution
Rate it:
Open Preview
29%
Flag icon
when things happen fast.
29%
Flag icon
The second network for stress is the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA). The HPA axis is what triggers the release of cortisol—the classic “stress molecule.”
29%
Flag icon
If you tell a woman that girls are bad at math and then give her a math test, she’s not going to do as well as a woman who wasn’t exposed to that threat. This effect is astonishingly robust; it works at every age, in nearly every possible experimental scenario, and even when you’re not testing women.
30%
Flag icon
Human brains are long evolved to carefully track how each individual fits into a larger group.
30%
Flag icon
We spend years carefully learning how to successfully live inside our deeply social world.
30%
Flag icon
It’s one of the most characteristic features of our species: that extended period of social learning. Our brains are built...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
30%
Flag icon
until puberty hits, there’s no reliable way to tell the difference between an XY brain being raised as a boy and an XX brain being raised as a girl.
30%
Flag icon
To find a model “Female” human brain, in the way most people mean it, you probably need to find an adult mind that’s been convinced it’s terrible at math, hyper social, sort of flighty, super moody, a bit fragile, and generally good at only a narrow range of things.
30%
Flag icon
It’s true that no one knows what functional features of the brain make any given individual identify as a gender other than what that person was assigned at birth. But so what? We also don’t know what makes a woman like me identify as a woman.[*36]
30%
Flag icon
It’s clear that there’s nothing in one’s DNA that codes for wearing a dress,
30%
Flag icon
in other words, but there might be things that “code” for being more likely to have positive feedback loops with social affirmation around gender presentation, or negative responses when one’s internal sense of a gender identity doesn’t seem to match with social expectation and/or when that person perceives negative social feedback.
30%
Flag icon
what lies with one’s genetic predisposition and what lies with one’s social environment are not going to be easily parsed. And that’s because the human brain is simply too social, too plastic, too malleable, too revisable to pin down like that.
30%
Flag icon
As our world becomes less and less sexist, being trans will become less distressing for the people who experience it.
30%
Flag icon
And so, because our girlhoods are different now, the average adult female’s brain is also probably a bit different from what it was a hundred years ago.
30%
Flag icon
You wouldn’t expect someone who’d been starved as a child to be six feet tall, even if her genes hold that potential. Neither should you expect a brain that’s been effectively starved to reach 150 IQ, even if the genetic potential is there.
30%
Flag icon
The results of those two tests tend to be correlated: if you took the test in the 1980s or 1990s, just divide your SAT score by 10, and you’ve got your likely IQ score, plus or minus 10.
30%
Flag icon
Taking a test in a non-native language is almost always a drag on your score—most
30%
Flag icon
one recent study from 2015 did show race outweighing both family income and parent education levels as a driver for SAT scores
30%
Flag icon
more nonwhite SAT takers are going to exclusively nonwhite schools, regardless of family income, and these “American apartheid” schools are famously underfunded and underserved.
30%
Flag icon
What’s more, your IQ scores tend to vary over your lifetime—tests designed for five-year-olds show a lower degree of difference between poor people and wealthier people than tests designed for eleven-year-olds (von Stumm and Plomin, 2015). Maybe instead of thinking of that as a “failure to thrive” because of some innate predilection for stupidity, it’d be better to think about that as potential evidence of accumulated harm.
30%
Flag icon
Though the mobile uterus was disavowed, “hysteria” remained: As late as the 1920s, clitoral stimulation was considered the proper treatment for feminine hysteria. That meant doctors—typically male—were obliged to stimulate moody women to orgasm in clinical settings. Hilariously, most of the doctors seemed to find the task boring and tedious, which drove the invention of the electric vibrator in Paris in the late nineteenth century.
30%
Flag icon
That could mean that male bipolar disorder is driven by different underlying functional mechanisms from women’s. Or it could mean that the hormone balance in the typical female brain is somehow interfering with how certain drug therapies work in these brains.
30%
Flag icon
As the psychiatric community is discovering, one need not be depressed to be suicidal—they just tend to go together. In fact, 54 percent of people who die by suicide did not have a diagnosable mental disorder, which may be because they failed to receive treatment and be diagnosed or because the onset was simply too rapid or unusual to catch
30%
Flag icon
the most obvious root is a social norm that makes motherhood more immediately “important” than fatherhood and ties a woman’s worth to her ability to care for children. Men are left with a model of fatherhood that doesn’t seem all that vital.
31%
Flag icon
As mentioned previously, some girls are now beginning puberty as young as age eight, clearly before their bodies or brains are ready to become mothers! No one knows why this is the case, but researchers suspect rising obesity, genetic predisposition, and hormones (potentially estrogen-mimicking molecules in the environment sending a false trigger to the ovaries, or some other unusual new factor)
31%
Flag icon
Simone de Beauvoir, who held that “one is not born, but rather becomes, a woman,” you’re not wrong
31%
Flag icon
Complex systems naturally behave complexly, so being genderqueer is just as “natural” as being cisgender. And for me, given what we now know about human brains, the idea that “girlhood” (that is, childhood brain development as a female-identified person in a sexist society and the accumulated, influential, remembered experiences associated with those years) might be one of the driving features of the rather odd set of things that happen to so many adolescent girls’ cognitive test scores is both true and ultimately freeing.
31%
Flag icon
In other words, I suspect what’s innate is a drive to construct some kind of gender identity in the deeply social lives of sexed hominins like Homo sapiens, and because we’re the only primates who can talk, we’re the only ones who can self-report our experience with depth and nuance.
31%
Flag icon
Tenrecs are the mammalian equivalent of “hold my beer.”
31%
Flag icon
I’ve never met a woman, cis or trans or otherwise, who 100 percent enjoys the experience of living as a woman or girl in a sexist society….Sexism
31%
Flag icon
One can be comfortable with one’s gender identity and still be exhausted by the experience of living it.
31%
Flag icon
ORDINARY MAGIC
31%
Flag icon
We are the only talking ape.
31%
Flag icon
We’re so linguistic, in fact, that we’ve even managed to figure out ways to create language without any sound at all.
31%
Flag icon
animals’ vocalizations—they
31%
Flag icon
But those messages are usually as simple as a smoke alarm.
31%
Flag icon
No other animal has human grammar.
31%
Flag icon
every living human culture has language. We might have started talking as far back as 1.7 million years ago. Or as recently as 200,000 years. Some think it was only 50,000 years ago, which might as well be yesterday in our evolution.
31%
Flag icon
When Homo habilis started making her stone tools, she probably wasn’t speaking yet—the configuration of her throat and mouth and chest would have made it very hard to pull it off.
31%
Flag icon
Her immediate descendants probably weren’t talking, either.
31%
Flag icon
Their throats were wrong. Their mouths were wrong. The...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
31%
Flag icon
If that’s accurate, then all those elaborate stone tools and early gynecology were learned and passed on through direct observation and super-simple gestures and sounds.
31%
Flag icon
The soonest hominins seemed to have a modern vocal apparatus—throat, jaw, and tongue in the right place—is only a few hundred thousand years ago.
32%
Flag icon
Neanderthals, Heidelbergensis, Homo sapiens. Those three alone.
32%
Flag icon
There is one point in human history, between fifty thousand and thirty thousand years ago, where innovation seemed to explode.
32%
Flag icon
What’s more, we had symbolic culture: Cave paintings. Symbolic carving. Burial cultures.
32%
Flag icon
We took our old stone tools and made far better ones. These innovations spread rapidly—up
32%
Flag icon
What is humanity’s earliest art all about? Hunting.
32%
Flag icon
Also, most of humanity’s ancestors weren’t particularly adept hunters.
32%
Flag icon
If anything, we were scavengers and prey—the favorite snack of large hyenas and lions and pretty much anything else that managed to catch us.
1 9 14