Good Strategy Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why It Matters
Rate it:
Open Preview
73%
Flag icon
First, they anticipated a large jump in performance from putting more and more of the graphics pipeline onto a single chip.
73%
Flag icon
Nvidia, by contrast, planned to use that extra density to add more parallel processors, boosting performance—a
Matthew Ackerman
Incumbents focused on cutting costs while nvidia focused on improving computing (incumbent inertia?)
73%
Flag icon
The GPU [graphics processing unit] is going to be the center of technology and value added in consumer computing.”
Matthew Ackerman
Focus on value added product instead of costs by improving computing capability through proprietary design
73%
Flag icon
They made this assessment after meeting with the DirectX team and finding them to be graphics enthusiasts who wanted to push the frontier as fast as possible.
Matthew Ackerman
Though not the end user, Nvidia understood developers well and what their goals were in delivering a valuable product to end users
73%
Flag icon
looked possible to advance graphics power three times faster than CPU power, Nvidia could deliver a substantial upgrade in graphics power every six months instead of every eighteen months.
Matthew Ackerman
Requires agility where incumbent inertia will slow competition
73%
Flag icon
Nvidia team designed a set of cohesive policies and actions to turn their guiding policy into reality.
Matthew Ackerman
Here's how we will complete 6 month development cycles... The coordinated actions follow
73%
Flag icon
The first step in executing the guiding policy was the establishment of three separate development teams.
Matthew Ackerman
Every 6 months, delivering more powerful graphics cards?
73%
Flag icon
Nvidia invested heavily in simulation and emulation techniques and organized its chip design process around these methods.
73%
Flag icon
Such tools were the forte of founder Chris Malachowsky,
Matthew Ackerman
Importance of a strong team
73%
Flag icon
To protect against these kinds of problems, the company also invested in the more difficult task of simulating the electrical characteristics of the chip.
Matthew Ackerman
Continuously investing in derisking activities that would lead to delays in a 6 month development cycle, thereby increasing value with coordinated programs
73%
Flag icon
To address these problems, Nvidia took control of the creation and management of drivers for its chips, developing a unified driver architecture (UDA).
Matthew Ackerman
Change in business model to increase production reliability, yield, and coordination between complementary components of the business
74%
Flag icon
They described the obstacles created by current industry practices,
74%
Flag icon
showed the economic benefits of the unified driver architecture,
74%
Flag icon
the lower prices contract board manufacturers...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
74%
Flag icon
The difference is that the effects of Intel’s performance increases have been substantially dulled by hardware and software bottlenecks it cannot control. On the other hand, as Nvidia’s leaders envisioned, the performance of graphics chips is experienced directly and immediately by users.
74%
Flag icon
in general, if you have a “me-too” product, you prefer fragmented retail buyers. On the other hand, if you have a better product, a powerful buyer such as Dell can help it see the light of day.
74%
Flag icon
Sometimes the impediment is the innovator’s patent or similar protection, but more often it is an unwillingness or inability to replicate the innovator’s policies.
75%
Flag icon
he was setting a goal, not designing a way to deal with his company’s challenge.
75%
Flag icon
Second, growth is the outcome of a successful strategy, and attempts to engineer growth are exercises in magical thinking.
75%
Flag icon
The network of human capital in this industry was sparse and well understood.
75%
Flag icon
acquiring it would deny these scarce competencies to a competitor.
76%
Flag icon
a good business strategy deals with the edge between the known and the unknown.
76%
Flag icon
you first test a new conjecture against known laws and experience.
76%
Flag icon
If the hypothesis survives that test, the scientist has to devise a real-world test—an experiment—to see how well the hypothesis stands up.
76%
Flag icon
you are working with accumulated wisdom about your business and your industry that is unlike anyone else’s.
76%
Flag icon
A good strategy is, in the end, a hypothesis about what will work.
77%
Flag icon
it must embody some ideas or insights into new combinations of resources for dealing with new risks and opportunities.
77%
Flag icon
deduction applies a fixed set of logical rules to a fixed set of known facts.
Matthew Ackerman
Solving a problem in a predictable way...not strategy, just solving, literally
77%
Flag icon
To generate a strategy, one must put aside the
77%
Flag icon
comfort and security of pure deduction and launch into the murkier waters of induction, analogy, judgment, and insight.
79%
Flag icon
To expect to make money from a new business, the entrepreneur should know something that others do not, or have control of a scarce and valuable resource.
80%
Flag icon
One of the most important resources a business can have is valuable privileged information—that is, knowing something that others do not.
80%
Flag icon
once Schultz initiated business operations, he began to accumulate privileged information.
81%
Flag icon
It did so in order to be able to mutually adjust multiple elements of its business and to capture the information generated by each element of its business operations.
81%
Flag icon
When a company can buy perfectly good products and services from outside suppliers, it is usually wasteful to go through the expense and trouble of mastering a new set of business operations.
81%
Flag icon
when the core of a business strategy requires the mutual adjustment of multiple elements, and especially when there is important learning to be captured about interactions across business elements, then it may be vi...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
82%
Flag icon
think through the intersection between what was important and what was actionable.
84%
Flag icon
To search for a new insight, one would have to put aside the comfort of being oriented and once again cast
84%
Flag icon
around in choppy waters for a new source of stability.
84%
Flag icon
To put it simply, our minds dodge the painful work of questioning and letting go of our first early judgments,
84%
Flag icon
You can choose how you will approach a problem; you can guide your own thinking about it.”
84%
Flag icon
the ability to think about your own thinking, to make judgments about your own judgments.
84%
Flag icon
This experience accumulates in the form of associations between situations and “what works” or “what can happen” in those situations.
85%
Flag icon
First, you must have a variety of tools for fighting your own myopia and for guiding your own attention.
85%
Flag icon
Second, you must develop the ability to question your own judgment.
85%
Flag icon
Third, you must cultivate the habit of making and recording judgments so that you can improve.
85%
Flag icon
The kernel is a list reminding us that a good strategy has, at a minimum, three essential components: a diagnosis of the situation, the choice of an overall guiding policy, and the design of coherent action.
85%
Flag icon
The concept of the kernel defines the logic of a strategy—the bare-bones minimum.
85%
Flag icon
the kernel does, however, is remind us that a strategy is more than a localized insight. It is an internally consistent argument that leads from facts on the ground to diagnosis, thence to an overall directive, thence to action.
85%
Flag icon
strategy also embodies an approach to overcoming some difficulty.