once, after dozing off in my comfy chair, I woke to find him addressing the air from his perch. No distinct words, but the rhythm and tone of his burbling were those of someone trying to work something out, not a math problem, but a dialectical argument of some intensity.
Isn't it more likely akin to the babble of very young children just learning to talk, rather than a dialectical argument? This is the sort of whimsy I find irritating in Nunez.
