The Beginning of Infinity: Explanations That Transform the World
Rate it:
Open Preview
3%
Flag icon
Realism and the Aim of Science (1983)
4%
Flag icon
the very term ‘data’ (‘givens’) is misleading.
4%
Flag icon
we are born with ideas, and with the ability to make progress by changing them.
4%
Flag icon
Persephone,
4%
Flag icon
theories are easily variable
4%
Flag icon
bad explanations.
4%
Flag icon
The quest for good explanations is, I believe, the basic regulating principle not only of science, but of the Enlightenment generally.
4%
Flag icon
‘the West’ – grew around the values entailed by the quest for good explanations,
James Aitchison
And good practical decisions
4%
Flag icon
as tolerance of dissent, openness to change, distrust of dogmatism and authority, and the aspiration to progress both by individuals and for the culture as a whole.
4%
Flag icon
Now consider the true explanation of seasons. It is that the Earth’s axis of rotation is tilted relative to the plane of its orbit around the sun.
4%
Flag icon
That is a good explanation – hard to vary, because all its details play a functional role.
5%
Flag icon
it is only when a theory is a good explanation – hard to vary – that it even matters whether it is testable.
5%
Flag icon
Bad explanations are equally useless whether they are testable or not.
5%
Flag icon
The best explanations are the ones that are most constrained by existing knowledge
5%
Flag icon
explanation-based conception of science
5%
Flag icon
The theory reaches out,
5%
Flag icon
This reach of explanations is another meaning of ‘the beginning of infinity’.
5%
Flag icon
It is the ability of some of them to solve problems beyond those that they were created to solve.
5%
Flag icon
the present era in human history, unique for its sustained, rapid creation of knowledge with ever-increasing reach.
6%
Flag icon
Explanation   Statement about what is there, what it does, and how and why.
6%
Flag icon
Reach   The ability of some explanations to solve problems beyond those that they were created to solve.
6%
Flag icon
Fallibilism
6%
Flag icon
Problem   A problem exists when a conflict between ideas is experienced.
6%
Flag icon
Good/bad explanation   An explanation that is hard/easy to vary while still accounting for what it purports to account for.
6%
Flag icon
The Enlightenment   (The beginning of) a way of pursuing knowledge with a tradition of criticism and seeking good explanation...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
6%
Flag icon
Rational   Attempting to solve problems by seeking good explanations; actively pursuing error-correction by creating criticisms of both existing ideas and new proposals.
6%
Flag icon
The West   The political, moral, economic and intellectual culture that has been growing around the Enlightenment values of science, reason and freedom.
6%
Flag icon
the real source of our knowledge is conjecture alternating with criticism.
6%
Flag icon
adding to existing ideas with the intention of improving upon them.
6%
Flag icon
I wondered whether I would be the first and last human being ever to pay conscious attention to a particular galaxy.
7%
Flag icon
terms they only ever separate us further from it. But we observe nothing directly anyway. All observation is theory-laden.
7%
Flag icon
Most ancient accounts of the reality beyond our everyday experience were not only false, they had a radically different character from modern ones: they were anthropocentric.
7%
Flag icon
they centred on human beings, and more broadly on people – entities with intentions and human-like thoughts – which included powerful, supernatural people such as spirits and gods.
7%
Flag icon
that anthropocentric approach has never yielded any good explanations beyond the realm of human affairs. In regard to the physical world at large, it was colossally misconceived.
7%
Flag icon
‘Principle of Mediocrity’:
7%
Flag icon
Stephen Hawking put it, humans are ‘just a chemical scum on the surface of a typical planet that’s in orbit round a typical star on the outskirts of a typical galaxy’.
7%
Flag icon
‘in the cosmic scheme of things’
7%
Flag icon
parochialism.
7%
Flag icon
Spaceship Earth.
8%
Flag icon
People are significant in the cosmic scheme of things;
8%
Flag icon
The Earth’s biosphere is incapable of supporting human life.
8%
Flag icon
the overwhelming majority of species that have ever existed on Earth (perhaps 99.9 per cent of them) are now extinct.
8%
Flag icon
the ‘life-support system’ itself wiped them out
8%
Flag icon
Earth’s ‘life-support system for humans’ has been provided not for us but by us, using our ability to create new knowledge.
8%
Flag icon
There are people in the Great Rift Valley today who live far more comfortably than early humans did, and in far greater numbers, through knowledge of things like tools, farming and hygiene.
8%
Flag icon
the biosphere is incapable of supporting human life. From the outset, it was only human knowledge that made the planet even marginally habitable by humans, and the enormously increased capacity of our life-support system since then (in terms both of numbers and of security and quality of life) has been entirely due to the creation of human knowledge.
9%
Flag icon
ancient myths of a past Golden Age,
9%
Flag icon
human abilities, including the distinctive ones such as the ability to create new explanations, are necessarily parochial.
9%
Flag icon
progress in science cannot exceed a certain limit defined by the biology of the human brain.
9%
Flag icon
reach: