The key word here is "prejudice" as occurs in books and stories about America and Americans.
Thom
6022 books
294 friends
294 friends
Janet
1848 books
18 friends
18 friends
Brixton
932 books
42 friends
42 friends
Jonathan
1401 books
102 friends
102 friends
Akeisa
395 books
22 friends
22 friends
Themis-Athena (Lioness at Large)
546 books
365 friends
365 friends
Amy
2013 books
12 friends
12 friends
Philip
862 books
2 friends
2 friends
More voters…
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »


As early as the early 1940s, Ashley Montagu and other anthropologists, biologists, etc rejected the very concept of 'race'. They continue to do so.
The argument is not that there are no biological differences between humans, nor that there is no genetic component to these differences (indeed, at the time, they thought both were greater than they really are). Rather, they argue that there do not exist 2, or 10, or 128, or however many groups of people with sufficient similarities within the groups, and sufficient differences between the groups that it makes sense to call them 'races'. Some have rejected this concept not only for humans, but for other species, where the term had been used to describe geographic variations, but became, in the opinion of too many biologists, too contaminated by vernacular terminology to be useful in scientific papers.
Too many people, in resisting racists, accept the terms and categories of the racists, and simply argue that the 'races' have different characteristics than the racists propose.


I can see where "Italian," "Irish" etc. comes in -- there used to be a time (in the 19th and early 20th century) when people in the U.S. would actually equate natio..."
What I'm trying to get at is Gordon Allport's definition of "Prejudice" in his book, The Nature of Prejudice.... a perception that someone other than yourself is "ESSENTIALLY OTHER".

"Through our maps, we willingly become a part of their boundaries. If our home is included, we feel pride, perhaps familiarity, but always a sense that this is ours. If it is not, we accept our roles as outsiders, though we may be of the same mind and culture. In this way, maps can be dangerous and powerful tools." — Debbie Lee Wesselmann: Trutor & the Balloonist
Not quite the same sentiment, but close enough ... One of my all-time favorite quotes!

"Through our maps, we willingly become a par..."
Made what I hope are improvements to title, May 7, 2011, and thanks.

(I'm just giving you a hard time) ;o)"
Well.... except for Kenyans born in Hawaii with phony birth certificates.

(I'm just giving you a hard time) ;o)"
Well.... except for Kenyans born in Hawaii with phony birth certificates."
LOL. Indeed ... :)

Whenever I hear someone rave about The Help, I suggest they read Your Blues Ain't Like Mine. The Help has good parts, but on the whole Your Blues Ain't Like Mine -- a novel based on the Emmett Till murder -- seems so much more realistic and honest about how horrible conditions were for African-Americans in the 1950s South.
Here's a post I wrote about the novel for Newsworthy Novels, a blog that matches novels to today's headlines and events (this entry was for Black History Month): http://newsworthynovels.blogspot.com/...
I can see where "Italian," "Irish" etc. comes in -- there used to be a time (in the 19th and early 20th century) when people in the U.S. would actually equate national origin with "race," especially when referring to immigrants ("the Italian race," "the Irish race," etc.). But "Muslim" refers to religion IMHO ... you can be Black, Caucasian, Hispanic and whathaveyou and simultaneously be Muslim (or, for that matter, Christian or Atheist, etc.). So unless "race" is intended to also refer to the relationship between religions, I'd humbly suggest replacing "Muslim" by some other term ...