Comments on Must Read Classics - page 2
Comments Showing 51-73 of 73 (73 new)
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Jan
(new)
Jun 25, 2016 11:49AM

reply
|
flag



I'm with you Tyler. I would add that Faulkner and Dreiser always make an appearance on these lists, and I have no good words for them either. Great for torture!



Greetings Eli! Books are added by readers like you. So go ahead and add that book to your list! When they get as long as this one it does take a while to move up the list to the first page though.

I was kind of wondering that myself. Some books don't seem like classics.


Well I put diary of a wimpy kid back!

Just curious, why? I don't think it's been out long enough to be considered a "classic" and not sure it fits the usual other guidelines to determine if a book is a classic or not.

But it is NOT old enough yet."
I tend to think conservatively with regard to canon, but Charlotte's Web was published over 70 year ago. It's older than the #1 book on this list To Kill a Mockingbird, and 3 other books in the top 20 of the list, and half a century older than books like "Diary of a Wimpy Kid or the Harry Potter books.
Since the list description doesn't have a definition of 'classic,' I'm genuinely curious how many years do you think are needed? It seems to be a common point of conflict about what is a classic.

Gtasby is not even old
