Comments on Best Books Ever - page 7
Comments Showing 301-350 of 4,706 (4706 new)

I agree. Well said.



Ugh. Then I say you are one of those people who arn't entitled to an opinion.
As a matter of factly, I have read the book of mormon, I even own a copy.
Nephi 13:16
Moreover, the Lord saith: Because the daughters of Zion are haughty, and walk with stretched-forth necks and wanton eyes, walking and mincing as they go, and making a tinkling with their feet
13:17 Therefore the Lord will smite with a scab the crown of the head of the daughters of Zion, and the Lord will discover their secret parts.
Love that one.
Not enough to make the best books ever list though.

Nor does it justify imposing it on others.
The problem I have with all religions and those who believe in them is that since they believe they have the right - in fact the duty - to impose it on others.
This is particularly a characteristic of a couple of the world's religions, most notably Christianity, which believes it its their religious obligation to convert. I suspect Islam follows the same concept.
GoodReads is for books, literature and while some read the various bibles as literature, I don't count any of them as the best books I've ever read.
If you vote for the bible, then I vote for The Origin of the Species by Charles Darwin. Now that's a book that makes perfect sense.
i completely agree with what tom (above) said about the imposing of beliefs on others, but both darwins theory and other theories ive heard as of now could all live in relation to eachother and could actually fill the blanks left by other belief systems.


In science, a theory is a hypothesis that has been verified through testing. So it basicallhy has been proven true.
What bibles describe is faith. That is not fact or science or theory. It is belief. Many people who believe in evolution also believe in a God, so evolution and belief in God are not contradictory. Faith does not have to be proven - in fact - it can't be proven by science. That's what makes it faith.
They do, as Heather says, fill in the gaps.
I believe God and the Devil exist in the way I believe that Moby Dick or Captain Ahab exist. Someone thought up some really great characters and created an entire universe to go with them.



and why does ..." It's not a joke . Just because some people don't believe in it or read it doesn't mean they have to bag on it and freak out about it being up there. It's a book , come on people are being immature. If they don't like it then they are just going to have to deal. And people could theoretically put Twilight in #1 position or even to kill a mocking bird.

as the best books ever written? seems to be a bias here...
" Wow everyone is seriously freaking out about this . If you don't like it then vote for other books.


Regardless of whether you believe the tales in these books actually happened, that doesn't change the fact that they're not very well written. They're often tedious, pretentious and repetitious, and have no place anywhere near the top-ten of a list of the "best books ever"...
Before anyone accuses me of just being anti-religious (which would be true), I also don't think "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" belongs in the top ten. It's a very good book on many levels, but *not* the ninth best book ever.



This is not a site to discuss theology, but Good Reads - good books, great books - and I think we are talking about FICTION, which for most people means that bibles should not be here.
That doesn't mean they aren't valid books - they're just not novels. Maybe they should be on the Top 100 Self-Help Books because that's what they really are.
I personally think that all bibles are fiction, and not very well-written novels or very good novels at that.
Okay, maybe there are some good stories in different bibles - the Book of Job in particular could, as a stand alone novel, be considered for a top 1000 list.
But bibles don't belong on a top 100 list primarily comprised of fiction.


It's very difficult to keep our opinions to ourselves on a website dedicated to posting opinions. That sort of defeats the purpose of GR.
We are only exploring our ideas of what we consider great books, which helps us in our future reading.
Lists serve a valuable purpose. Think of them as mirrors that enable us to examine our tastes.
I love lists because they enable me to evaluate my own tastes - and, more important, every so often I discover a book I've never heard of that is worth exploring and, more often, motivates me to pick up a book on my to-read list I keep putting off.
I'd like to think that people who participate on GR are into books and so therefore by definition are people who have open minds.


I think it's great that you feel passionately about a book - regardless of which one it is. I wish more people respected books. And I understand. I don't take kindly to people stupidly criticizing my favorite books. In a way, I suppose it is a personal attack because they are banging on my opinions - and what else are we but a collection of feelings?


Exactly, it is a huge hit to your personal feelings also. I mean ecspecially if it is a religious book. Some people live and breath their religions and they take these comments to heart. I don't want the book of mormon up there only because people keep bashing on it.





Tom I do not mean to bag on you I am just defending my religion and this may sound all cheesy or weird or whatever but it does hurt when people say that stuff. I am sorry for baggin on you.



Actually, I loved Twilight. (If you don't believe me, tell it to my three massive Twilight movie posters and my Comic-Con poster with the original movie release date I won in a Twilight writing contest. Don't try to tell me I'm not a twilighter.)
But I think that if you think it actually is The Best book EVER, then you need to read more. A lot more. Twilight is entertaining, but I would never call it quality reading. I feel badly for Stephenie every time I say that, because she is so sweet and kind, but it is the truth.


With all of this research behind me, I can safely say, that the quality of a book is not determined by its popularity nor its impact on the life choices of individuals.
If you believe that the Book of Mormon is the word of God, nevermind that twenty-five thousand words of it are borrowed directly from the Old Testament or that a further two thousand words are borrowed from the New Testament, and the "translater's" education is almost entirely based on the study of said Bible, your belief does not make it a masterpiece.
Just the style of writing alone should remove this book from the list. The words "and it came to pass" appear at least two thousand times! Any ninth grade English teacher would fail any paper this annoyingly repetitive.
Laying aside the racist insinuations about Native Americans, this book, whether ordained by God or invented by a con artist, is terribly written and is far from the second best book ever.

Sorry if I seemed aggressive, but I find whenever one critiques Twilight, some fans can be very defensive. -_-"
Of course, I've read them all. ^^
I have two copies of all the books, too. (One signed by Steph, one for reading.)
I love them, but I didn't like Eclipse or Breaking Dawn. I know Eclipse seems to be a fan favourite, but I can't see the appeal. Twilight is definitely my favourite of the series.



No, I met her. It was before Breaking Dawn came out, so I only have Twilight, New Moon and Eclipse signed.
But it was fantastic. She was so sweet.
as the best books ever written? seems to be a bias here...
"Yeah, stupid, wrongo!
I am mormon. And most of us believe in allowing everyone to choose what they believe and to express there beliefs and ideas without being ridiculed (including when they respectfully disagree). I am disappointed by and apologize for the unkind comments of some who aredefending The Book of Mormon."