Heart-Shaped Box in Pick-a-Shelf

Apr 06, 2015 Jayme(theghostreader) rated it liked it

Shelves: library-books-read

I liked the story and plot. I thought it was different. A guy buys a ghost on the internet. What he doesn't realize is the ghost is out to kill him. I liked the main characters as the story went on. Horror is not my genre though. I tried to branch out. I had to have a cut off time for reading it because I would dream about what I was reading. I thought that the story dragged on towards the end. ...more

5 likes · Like · see review

May 30, 2011 Rachael Sherwood rated it it was ok

Shelves: 2011

Maybe it was a victim of its own hype, but I was severely underwhelmed by this book. The characters didn't feel real, the writing was clumsy, and worst of all for a novel in this genre....it just wasn't that scary. I had no idea that the author was Stephen King's son until after I finished it but I was comparing it to King the entire time because it reminded me so much of him. They both are competent plotters with good ideas and complicated enough characters...but there's just no magic.

I think ...more

2 likes · Like · see review

Oct 21, 2017 Madge rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: horror, ghosts-hauntings, kindle-books

Warning: the spoiler tags will definitely have profanity.

When I started this book, I was pretty sure it would be between a 4 & 5 star read for me. I read Horns a year or two ago and loved Joe Hill's writing, and I was really enjoying the first half or so of this one. And honestly, my docking a star (I think I would have given this 4 stars) is possibly petty. But it is what it is, and I don't really feel guilty for it.

I really liked the premise for this story, and it started off strong. Aging roc Warning: the spoiler tags will definitely have profanity.

When I started this book, I was pretty sure it would be between a 4 & 5 star read for me. I read Horns a year or two ago and loved Joe Hill's writing, and I was really enjoying the first half or so of this one. And honestly, my docking a star (I think I would have given this 4 stars) is possibly petty. But it is what it is, and I don't really feel guilty for it.

I really liked the premise for this story, and it started off strong. Aging rock star buys a ghost off the internet and creepy things start happening? Yes, please! It sounded like something I would love, and I did love most of the basic story. I was also pleasantly surprised to find myself actually a bit scared a few times while reading this, which doesn't happen often for me.

The slowly building sense of dread was great and hooked me early on, but at some point started to lose me. (view spoiler) It started to grab me again a little while later, only to lose me for most of the rest of the book. (view spoiler) I kind of regained a little interest in the story, minus the sense of dread, in the last few chapters. (view spoiler) But by then, I was just ready for the book to be over. I liked the ending, though. (view spoiler)

And here the rant, which gets somewhat off topic of the book, begins. (view spoiler)[I am sick, so freaking sick, of horror movies and stories and novels abusing and killing animals. For me, at least, that isn't horror. It's just there for the fucking shock value and playing with people's emotions, and I'm so tired of it. I'm tired of child abuse and sexual assault, too. I can't actually think of any horror novels I've read that didn't have one of those things. If your horror needs a woman and/or child being abused/raped/assaulted, or animals being abused or killed, you're not doing your fucking job as a horror creator. I probably wouldn't be so mad about this if it wasn't so prevalent, but it's such a disgusting trope now, and I'm tired of it.

In my opinion, those tropes are the book equivalent of horror movies relying on jump scares or gore.

I don't think I would have a problem with a character finding a dead animal, like left as a threat or something. Hell, even an animal dying in the book wouldn't be so bad (and by "bad," I don't mean "scary") if the writers weren't constantly going for in depth descriptions of how much the animal is/was suffering, and all the details of how horrific their mutilation was, etc.

The same is true for survivors of whatever form of abuse. I'm just tired of it. I'm tired of these characters with awful, abuse-filled pasts, like "Look! This character survived all these terrible things, but they get to go through even more terrible things as a reward!" As an abuse survivor, I'm not impressed, I'm not amused, I'm just pissed off. I'm lucky in the way that I can read most of this without crossing into being triggered by it. It does happen sometimes, but I'm usually ok. But I'm so tired of trying to find horror and thriller books to recommend to friends, and having to warn them to not read 99% of the ones I find because I don't want them to be triggered by the detailed descriptions of the types of abuse and assault they survived.

Do I think authors should censor themselves and not write about these things? No. I do think it's become too pervasive in the horror and thriller genres, though. It's like the slasher movies that just wouldn't stop coming. Eventually, people started to get tired of them because that's almost all that was out there. Or the YA books about vampires, or dystopians. There were big jumps in the number of those books, or in the popularity of them, for a while. Interest hasn't totally dropped off, of course, but it did seem to decline after a while because people were getting tired of reading the same things over and over.

Maybe I've just been unlucky and actually most of the horror and thriller books out there don't have these elements at all. I doubt that, though, because most of the people I've talked about this with have felt the same way, and have read more of these books than I have. (hide spoiler)]

I think this was Joe Hill's first novel. I'm pretty sure that before this, he'd had short stories published, but nothing this long. As a first novel, it's very well-written. His characters are great, the scary bits are scary, he did a good job with creating a creepy atmosphere, etc. I just had issues with it which might not bother most other people. I doubt my reviews on here influence people's decisions to read/skip a book, but if they do, don't let my less-than-thrilled feelings stop you from reading it if you think you'll like it. It is, mostly, a good book, and it is scary at times.

Will I continue to read Joe Hill? Heck yeah. He is a talented writer, and I want to know what else he comes up with. (view spoiler) ...more

Like · see review