From the Bookshelf of LessWrong

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Louis
Nov 14, 2014 rated it really liked it
A book that I want to read more than once.
Matthias
If we were to organize a list of the greatest 2000–2019 nonfiction books, I think Thinking, Fast and Slow should be there.

The book was published in 2011, but it’s already (I'm writing this in 2017) a classic, and has dramatically changed the debate in anything related to the social sciences.

It summarizes some of the most interesting insights from the last 50 years of research in cognitive and social psychology, and it makes self-evident how large their effects can be on other fields like eco
...more
Tony
Apr 03, 2018 rated it liked it
This was longer-winded and less good than I expected. Kahneman is entitled to describe the work in much greater detail than others, since he was the originator of a great deal of it. However, he's a little late to the party, as it's been extensively covered in pop-science literature. To his credit, he cites many of these works (e.g. Nudge) or their originating school of thought (The Chicago School, which begot Freakonomics and its ilk). However, he doesn't have anything new to contribute to the ...more
Screw Driver
Aug 27, 2018 rated it really liked it
This book is about cognitive biases, i.e. systematic patterns of how humans behaviour deviates from optimal, fast intuitive vs slow analytical mind, and choices. The author's got a Nobel prize in economics and is a smart and trustworthy (science-wise) person overall.

I am not sure if knowledge from the book is useful enough to me. It was quite boring to read. Also a few early chapters talk about psychological effects which later turned out to be weaker or to work in a different way than it was th
...more
Vlad Sitalo
It is a truly fascinating book, that governs you through the peculiarities of how your mind really works.

One great thing about this book is an approach that author is using. He gives readers not only interesting new information based on cognitive science research but a new view of themselves. He is asking readers a question. And answers when the reader gives an answer - it demonstrates the particular point author is making at the moment. And it changes the way readers view themselves.
Jason Swanson
Dec 30, 2018 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
Peter Nosko
Dec 15, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites, physical
Michal
Dec 16, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites
Bruno
Dec 20, 2013 marked it as to-read
Marie
Dec 27, 2013 marked it as to-read
Harley Waldstein
Jan 06, 2014 marked it as to-read
Alexander Telfar
Feb 26, 2014 rated it really liked it
NoName
Mar 13, 2014 rated it really liked it
Sixes and Sevens
Apr 09, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Mads Haneborg
May 07, 2014 rated it really liked it
Joar Granström
May 26, 2014 rated it really liked it
Olli Huotari
May 29, 2014 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Hugh Betcha
Nov 10, 2014 marked it as to-read
Jin Pyo
Dec 29, 2014 rated it it was amazing
Particle Mania
Jun 05, 2015 rated it really liked it
Joseph St Charles
Jun 06, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: economics-micro
Arun Pradeep
Sep 18, 2015 marked it as to-read
Shelves: to-readq, slow-track
Sreejith Puthanpurayil
Nov 18, 2015 marked it as to-read
Eilenberg
Jan 08, 2016 marked it as to-read
Shelves: hplus-ai
Harsha Gurnani
Mar 19, 2016 marked it as to-read
Kaura
May 24, 2016 rated it really liked it
Anna
Jun 05, 2016 marked it as to-read
Shelves: spirituality
Andrew
Mar 01, 2021 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition