From the Bookshelf of Sword & Sorcery: "An earthier sort of fantasy"

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Jason Ray Carney
If this was a dessert, it maybe wouldn't be worth the calories, but it would still be a dessert, and I enjoy dessert. On the sentence level, de Camp and Lin Carter are skilled writers. On the plot level, however, their story is often slow, excessively complex in political intrigue (for S&S), and occasionally a dry slog. The actual REH Conan tales, to generalize, are narrow and personal in scope, so perhaps that expectation set me up for frustration. Why? This novel is political and military in s ...more
Charles
Dec 31, 2008 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fantasy
definitely better than Conan and the Spider God. I enjoyed it fairly well. Interesting cover painting too.
Derek
Howard skipped the parts that connect "Conan the freebooting troublemaker" and the Conan of _Hour of the Dragon_, and reading de Camp / Carter's attempt at filling that piece, I am pretty sure I understand why. You can concoct a grand tale of a rebel army on the march, intent on liberating an oppressed land, and the political machinations behind it, but it doesn't feel like a Conan story.

Perhaps the latter half is different but the first would be better titled _Conan the Strategist_ and that do
...more
Riju Ganguly
Aug 16, 2024 rated it it was ok
This was a surprisingly dull novel where Conan acted like a pawn in a purely political chess. He was ineffective (even in his horniness). The sorcery part was worse than B-movies. And the ending violated the canonical narrative by taking too many liberties.
If the rest of de Camp's works are also of this standard, then people should straightaway hail John C. Hocking and Chuck Dixon as true successors of Howard. At least I have no doubt in this regard.
You’ve been warned.
...more
Jon
Sep 18, 2024 rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fantasy
This follows Conan the Swordsman and I liked that one pretty well as my first foray into non-Howard Conan and this one is... not so good. This doesn't feel like Howard's Conan at all. I'll be changing things up in my Cimmerian September by reading Hocking's Conan and the Emerald Lotus next. ...more
Keith
Mar 31, 2008 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fantasy, conan
Jason
Apr 24, 2008 rated it it was ok
Colin Leidner
Jul 01, 2008 rated it liked it
Michael
Feb 21, 2009 rated it it was ok
Jim Kuenzli
Jun 10, 2009 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Bill Gudde
Dec 15, 2009 rated it it was ok
Bruce
Aug 05, 2010 rated it it was ok
Shelves: fantasy
Davide
Mar 05, 2012 rated it liked it
Mark
Nov 30, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shehreyar
Apr 06, 2013 marked it as to-read
Aaron Meyer
Aug 22, 2013 marked it as to-read
Shelves: fantasy
Tom
Dec 14, 2013 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: owned
Pierre Armel
Mar 17, 2014 rated it did not like it
Evan
Feb 07, 2015 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Erebus
Mar 18, 2015 rated it liked it
Rob
Aug 11, 2015 rated it really liked it
[Name Redacted]
May 14, 2016 marked it as to-read
Pulpateer
Aug 10, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2011-to-2020
« previous 1
80482

Sword & Sorcery: "An earthier sort of fantasy"