From the Bookshelf of Tackling the Pulitzer Prize Winners!…

A Visit from the Goon Squad

Jennifer Egan

Start date: May 1, 2011

Finish date: May 31, 2011

Discussion: The Tackled Pulitzers

Why we're reading this: This book was the 2010 Winner. See our discussion group on it for more about our responses.
[close] This book was the 2010 Winner. See our discussion group on it for more about our responses.

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 139 topics — 2,570 comments total

The Tackled Pulitzers

Wednesday's Child (Yiyun Li, 2024 finalist)
By Bookslut · 1 post · 15 views

last updated Dec 08, 2024 05:48AM

The Able McLaughlins (Margaret Wilson, 1924 winner)
By Rebecca · 5 posts · 31 views

last updated Nov 20, 2024 07:49AM

showing 4 of 4 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Jun 30, 2025 Roy rated it really liked it

Another notch in my Pulitzer Prize winner for Fiction belt. Like the previous one I read, Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout, the format of this book feels more like a short story collection than a novel. Rearranging the chapters would make little difference since we’re not following a narrative from beginning to end. From a marketing standpoint, novels are usually better sellers than short story collections or anthologies. So, even if A Visit from the Goon Squad and Olive Kitteridge were both Another notch in my Pulitzer Prize winner for Fiction belt. Like the previous one I read, Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout, the format of this book feels more like a short story collection than a novel. Rearranging the chapters would make little difference since we’re not following a narrative from beginning to end. From a marketing standpoint, novels are usually better sellers than short story collections or anthologies. So, even if A Visit from the Goon Squad and Olive Kitteridge were both conceived by their authors as story collections, they have figured out or been advised that it would be monetarily advantageous to categorize their books as novels. Even though Olive barely makes an appearance in some of the chapters/stories that comprise Strout’s book, I feel that the linking of them was a little stronger than was done by Jennifer Egan in her Pulitzer winner. That’s probably because Strout doesn’t experiment much with her prose, but rather, presents a series of events in the fictional town where Olive lives that are each written in the same literary style. Egan on the other hand jumps around from first person to second person to third person point of view. One notable chapter is written as a set of PowerPoint slides. I almost skipped that section, but decided not to and was glad I read it. Olive Kitteridge is largely, even if not completely, about a woman named Olive. The primary characters of A Visit from the Goon Squad are a former punk rocker turned record executive named Bennie Salazar, and a woman he employs named Sasha. But plenty of other characters are visited throughout the narrative, to the point where I lost track at times of whether I was revisiting a character who was at a different stage of their life than where they were at in the previous visit, or being introduced to a brand new character making an appearance because they are connected to Bennie and/or Sasha in some way. A Visit from the Goon Squad is mostly about the process of aging, and the music that helps shape our lives as we go through a variety of stages. Struggling or professionally successful, single or married or remarried, satisfied with one's lot in life or barely holding on to sanity as the bastards beat you down. Individually, each chapter is absorbing. It doesn't matter who is centered in it because each character's situation is as wonderfully displayed by Egan's steady hand as the others. Egan succeeds at an author’s primary job which is to make you care about what’s going on and who it’s happening to. But she refuses to stay in any one place. The setting of the current chapter will be a different time and place than where the preceding chapter left off, abandoning one story that reads as a strong standalone piece, presenting a new one to cast its spell before moving on to something else. Some chapters will be more compelling to you than others, per your taste. The one featuring a dictator had me briefly wondering if I had wandered into a different book and genre entirely, not that I didn't enjoy it. As for the previously mentioned PowerPoint section, it reads like…well, a PowerPoint presentation. Yet it manages to reveal a considerable amount of detail about the characters featured in the slides. A Visit from the Goon Squad is not as wildly experimental as a book such as House of Leaves, so no need for you to pull any hair out or to pour yourself a stiff drink while reading Egan’s prose. But she takes risks for sure and mostly pulls them off. I’m not a big re-reader of novels, but this is one I may come back to at some point down the line. I’m pretty sure that I missed out on some stuff because I was not paying sufficiently close attention. Some novels allow you to follow along effortlessly while others demand greater focus in order to notice character arcs to the full extent. A Visit from the Goon Squad falls into the latter category, and a second read would probably be beneficial to my full comprehension. Then again, an author’s job is to get it right the first time because many readers will leisurely visit a book just once. The Pulitzer Prize committee felt that Egan succeeded in a big way. As for me, overall, I enjoyed this book. But if I was to rank the Pulitzer winners that I’ve read so far, quite a few others would be placed above this one. Not meant as a slight, since the lower end of the best of the best is still a pretty sweet spot to be. When I choose to reread a novel, I prefer that it’s because I was so overwhelmed by its beauty the first time that I want a second helping, rather than rereading to confirm that I kept proper track of everyone and everything going on. In general, I like short story collections that feel like a collection of great short stories, and novels that feel, regardless of how many characters it contains, like a single great story. But I'm not the one handing out Pulitzer Prizes. ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Sep 24, 2011 Dree rated it really liked it

Shelves: the-northeast, 2011-reads, pulitzer-all-winner-short, 1001-read

I love books like this. The multiple narrators and points of view, the jumps across time and space, the finding out what happened to characters (even minor characters). What really happens in the book? I can't exactly explain it--we just learn about a variety of characters and the ways their lives interact, whether they know it or not. Much of it is a little bit funny, some crazy, some sad. But it is just points in the lives of some people. And it's great.

I was leaning toward 5 stars, but I got ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Jan 05, 2013 Jan rated it really liked it

Shelves: my-pulitzer-project

Another book in my attempt to read all of the winners of the Pulitzer Prize for fiction, this book reads more like a collection of short stories than a novel, except that the characters keep popping up at different life stages in stories told from different points of view. I loved the "Power Point" chapter, which told a complete story in a very different way. I probably would have given this book 5 stars, but the last chapter fell flat (in my opinion). I have noticed that even if a PP winner isn ...more

1 like · Like · see review

May 06, 2011 Crafterlyn rated it really liked it

I think the style of this book is written very much represents life today - it mirrors how we are are all networked together and we get little snippets of so many different people's lives. We may be a part of one chapter of someone's life, but then we often only hear about what is going on with them through other acquaintances or even just news updates.

Each chapter could really stand on its own as a short story, but I'm glad they are all pulled together so we can track the different characters a ...more

Like · see review

Dec 20, 2012 Kristi rated it really liked it

Shelves: reading-challenge-2012, 1001-books

A captivating read. Egan's novel is a set of interwoven narratives; each successive chapter develops a character introduced in a previous installment, filling in gaps in the overall narrative and illustrating the development of specific individuals over time. The title, "A Visit from the Goon Squad," is a reference to time; time visits each of the characters in her book, leading to destruction for some and redemption for others. The book has a rather large cast of characters, but the "main" ones A captivating read. Egan's novel is a set of interwoven narratives; each successive chapter develops a character introduced in a previous installment, filling in gaps in the overall narrative and illustrating the development of specific individuals over time. The title, "A Visit from the Goon Squad," is a reference to time; time visits each of the characters in her book, leading to destruction for some and redemption for others. The book has a rather large cast of characters, but the "main" ones are Bennie, a record exec, and Sasha, a troubled young woman who works as his assistant at one point. Egan returns to their narratives multiple times over the course of her book. Music and rock culture feature prominently in many of the chapters, as well as life in New York City. Self-destruction, neuroses, love, sexuality, aging, identity, and family feature as major themes.

I thought this book was very interesting and well written. Egan had me hooked from the very first chapters on Sasha and Bennie. I thought that all of her characters had a very distinctive voice, which helped to maintain my interest over the course of the narrative. She also did an excellent job balancing the variety of the individual narratives with the coherence of the "overall" story. I thought it came together quite nicely. The one thing I didn't particularly like was the introduction of the idea of "pointers" (babies and young children who purchase music by merely pointing at their tablets) and the general development of social communication in the final chapter. I suppose Egan was trying to incorporate some commentary on the future in this closing section (since most of her chapters seem to take present in the ambiguous present or past), but it seemed like a rather heavy-handed and not terribly insightful way to make that move--I didn't really think it added to the core story and found it to be distracting.

I would recommend this book to pretty much anyone. If you're interested in music and rock culture, it will probably appeal to you a bit more than the average person. Since so much of the novel revolves around the theme of time and aging, I suspect that older readers will get more out of this than younger ones. ...more

Like · see review

Sep 03, 2011 Carly Svamvour rated it really liked it

I've listened to some of it this morning. Dunno how I feel really - I think it's because, being a child of the 50's and 60's, I don't really identify with punk rockers.

But ... I'll listen to a little more and see how I feel. I've seen this book show up a lot here at GR and expected to be 'really grabbed'.

.............

Now, I've two parts left - and feel kinda silly - I've spilled my guts about how I didn't like it but now find myself having actually liked some parts.

Maybe it's just one of those ...more

Like · see review

Oct 18, 2011 Cassi rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: pulitzer-prize-winner

I started this book fully expecting to hate it because of all of the negative reviews it has received. For the first half of the book I wondered what everyone was talking about. I thought that Egan was a skilled writer and I was enjoying the story lines. I liked how she played with time and jumped backwards and forwards within and across chapters. Each chapter in the book is written from a different character's perspective and each character is somehow related to Bennie Salazar, a successful mus I started this book fully expecting to hate it because of all of the negative reviews it has received. For the first half of the book I wondered what everyone was talking about. I thought that Egan was a skilled writer and I was enjoying the story lines. I liked how she played with time and jumped backwards and forwards within and across chapters. Each chapter in the book is written from a different character's perspective and each character is somehow related to Bennie Salazar, a successful music executive. We meet his group of friends and band mates during high school, his kleptomaniac assistant at several different points in her life, and his discontented wife shortly before their marriage falls apart, just to name a few. Throughout the story we receive small references to other characters we have met or will meet, and have to piece them together to create a picture of their life and connections to Bennie over the span of decades. Cool concept, what's not to like, right?

But then I hit the outlandish chapter describing the washed up La Doll, Bennie's wife's former boss, and her attempt to get back in the PR game by representing a foreign dictator general who eventually kidnaps the actress La Doll convinces to pretend to date him while they're at a hidden compound in the middle of the jungle. Come on! I would be more forgiving of a storyline like that if it didn't completely break the established tone of the story. After that, it just felt like Egan threw in a bunch of showy junk to prove how create she is. Next chapter: a piece of journalism filled with excessively parenthetical footnotes written by Bennie's brother-in-law describing his attempted rape of the young starlet featured in the previous chapter. The chapter after that: oh, it's second person, what an attention grabber! A few chapters later: it's an entire short story written in Power Point. No thanks.

If I had stopped reading this book after the first half, I probably would have given it 4-stars. But all of the contrived flourishes in the second half of the book really ruined it for me. The overall theme exploring the inevitable passing of time and the interesting structure of the story were redeeming (though very reminiscent of previous Pulitzer winner Olive Kitteridge) so I think Egan is talented writer when she's not showing off. ...more

Like · see review

Jun 18, 2010 Linda rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: pulitzer-prize-winners

This is a three-and-a-halfer, but I feel OK with letting it have four, for the moment anyway. It's interesting how brilliant everyone finds it, because I feel like the joke might be a teeny bit on the reader, along the lines of "We have met the enemy and it is us." But I definitely enjoyed reading it, whether or not it's Brilliant. The last couple chapters are my favorite because she does something I struggle daily to do, which is show how the "kids today" -- whatever we're calling them, not the ...more

Like · see review

Jul 06, 2011 Kathy McC rated it liked it

Shelves: pulitzer-winners

Won the 2011 Pulitzer Prize.
As with the winner last year's Pulitzer, Tinkers, I understand that the writing has an edge and that the prose is unique. The author shows off a variety of writing styles, especially Chapter 9 done with footnote style and Chapter 12 written in Power Point style. But,none of this prose creativity really does much for the plot development. Storyline really didn't do much for me. All in all, I'm glad I read it, but I wouldn't buy a copy. ...more

Like · see review

Feb 09, 2012 Leslye rated it really liked it · review of another edition

If 3 1/2 were an option, that would be my vote. I didn't really love it in the beginning, but it grew on me. ...more

Like · see review

May 28, 2012 Chris Ryan rated it really liked it

I liked it a lot. Innovative story presentation, interesting characters, great shifting perspectives. Yes, it has a chapter presented as a PowerPoint, no I am not jealous that I didn't think of that. Because I am not jealous of this book's success and nor was I affected by its hype, I was able to just sit back and enjoy it. And I did. ...more

Like · see review

Jun 08, 2012 S rated it liked it

Shelves: pulitzer, 2012

I loved the disconnected feel of the connections. I would've liked the book more though, if it hadn't been so full of sex and the f-word. I understand being realistic, but I felt like it was more for sensationalism than realism. ...more

Like · see review