From the Bookshelf of Around the World in 80 Books…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

A brilliant book that will make your blood run cold. Although the author herself claims it is not a prediction as we can never predict the future with great accuracy it does tell us what horrible things might happen (and we know have happened so many times in the past) if we keep our eyes closed, figuratively speaking, and refuse to acknowledge the changes in the society as they happen. How fragile is democracy (even the flawed one we have now) and how easily we could lose our basic freedoms and
...more

This book holds up well a second time although there's a 30-year time difference between reading and listening. Clare Danes' voice was perfect for the story. I alternated between listening and reading.
...more

Can a dystopian novel be lovely? This is one of the better dystopias and almost twenty years after I first read it the issues raised seemed even more relevant today with the rise of ultra-right wing politics. It is just weird to see Margaret Atwood so prevalent on Twitter -- how do you reconcile that with this tale?

I read this for the 2015 PopSugar Challenge in the category of a book that had bad reviews, as his was criticized by the NYTimes when first published in 1986. It is also one of the core books of the 1,001'Books to Read Before You Die list.
The epilogue was harder for me to get through than the rest of the book, which was from the protagonist's point if view. I am glad I waited until I was older to read this one as I could not have understood or appreciated this when I was in high school. The male ...more
The epilogue was harder for me to get through than the rest of the book, which was from the protagonist's point if view. I am glad I waited until I was older to read this one as I could not have understood or appreciated this when I was in high school. The male ...more

In the totalitarian theocracy that is the Republic of Gilead, Handmaids are “two-legged wombs, that’s all: sacred vessels, ambulatory chalices.” They are there simply for “breeding purposes”, enclosed within the white wings of their caps, and imprisoned within barriers and walls manned by Guardians. In this patriarchal society, the names of the Handmaids are derived from the names of the Commanders they are there to serve: Offred (of Fred), Ofglen (of Glen) and so on. FAITH rules, while HOPE and
...more

Weirdest sex scene I've ever read. All around decent dystopian fiction.
...more

This is why women march. Recommended reading for citizens of the Trump/Pence administration.


Nov 07, 2010
Amina
marked it as to-read

May 31, 2017
Tanya
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
list-1001-btrbyd,
2014

Oct 28, 2015
Kim DeCina
marked it as to-read

Nov 10, 2016
Shanna
marked it as to-read

Jan 11, 2017
Natasha
added it

Apr 04, 2017
Joy
marked it as to-read

May 14, 2017
Jules
added it

Oct 27, 2017
Lisa
added it

Dec 01, 2017
Ryan
marked it as to-read