From the Bookshelf of Sci-fi and Heroic Fantasy…

The Stand

Stephen King

Start date: June 1, 2016

Finish date: June 29, 2016

Discussion: Book Discussions

Discussion leader: Phil J

Why we're reading this: Group classic novel discussion June 2016
[close] Group classic novel discussion June 2016

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 250 topics — 8,801 comments total

Book Discussions

"Cyteen" by C.J. Cherryh
By deleted member · 48 posts · 103 views

last updated May 24, 2025 11:25PM

Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell by Susanna Clarke
By deleted member · 46 posts · 150 views

last updated Mar 28, 2025 02:28PM

What Members Thought

Apr 22, 2012 Andrea rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: fiction-scifi, fiction-horror, read-sorted, 2015-chunkster

People say that The Stand is King's definitive work - the monument to his genius as an author, his Magnum Opus. But I can't help comparing it to his other monster of a book, written sometime later - It, - and find it diminishing in its splendour. The quality of writing is top notch, but still does not evoke imagery as vivid and terrifying. The characters have their distinctive voices, but again, not as developed and complex. The motivations and prophecies are just not as effective in The Stand ( ...more

10 likes · Like · see review

Aug 30, 2011 Tracey rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: fantasy

Slightly longer review: on my blog.

I knew the beginning of the story very well: top secret research facility + oops (I don't think we ever find out what that first oops was – simple butterfingers?) + second oops of unlocked gate + fleeing guard + third oops of inattentive guards = worldwide catastrophe. A monster flu, a mega-flu, an über-flu, resistant to all treatment (or, rather, adaptive to all treatment), spreading with horrifying swiftness – augmented, apparently, by release of the same str Slightly longer review: on my blog.

I knew the beginning of the story very well: top secret research facility + oops (I don't think we ever find out what that first oops was – simple butterfingers?) + second oops of unlocked gate + fleeing guard + third oops of inattentive guards = worldwide catastrophe. A monster flu, a mega-flu, an über-flu, resistant to all treatment (or, rather, adaptive to all treatment), spreading with horrifying swiftness – augmented, apparently, by release of the same strain in other areas of the world to level the playing field, or some such. And only something like 1% of the population immune. It's very realistic. It's too realistic. I can see a situation, a chain of catastrophes, in which every single "oops" – dropped phial or whatever it was, mechanical failure in the alarm system, mechanical failure in the door seals, human failure of the guards, who should have been the last failsafe protection, playing cards in their booth instead of paying attention to their duty - all of it, easily preventable, and still happening. That's why this is one of the scariest horror novels I can think of. Not because of Russell Flagg (as much) – I was mostly afraid of the man-made epidemic.

My respect for Stephen King grows with every book of his I read, and my remorse at my long-held prejudice against him grows proportionately. This is a masterful work. Yes, I have a couple of quibbles: it seemed to take forever to move from the plot arc of the illness spreading to the arc of the survivors' quest. There is a vulgarity of language that is off-putting in most books (another status update: " I think my only, only issue with The Stand is the sheer number of people who wet their pants ... And none of them ever just "pees" much less urinates - they make wee-wee, or just make, or their bladders give way, or some such. It just starts being funny after a while." That's pretty typical, really.) But those are just quibbles. The language is part and parcel with the story, with the points of view, and, of course, with the writing style. And it took as long as it took.

The ending might not have been as ... "explosive" is hardly the right word, but I'll go with that - as it might have been. But, really, the book could have ended with a pie-eating contest between the Good Guys and Randall Flagg, and it would still be an astounding, even important book. This is a keeper. ...more

8 likes · Like · see review

Oct 11, 2012 Alex rated it it was ok · review of another edition

Shelves: on-hold, can-t-be-bothered

What I read of this I'm rating 2 stars. That was the first 25% I was going to come back and finish this book but I keep looking at it and I think "Yeah, I don't give a fuck, actually" Life is short and I have a lot of other stuff to read.

File it under maybe one day - but I honestly doubt that I'll ever be revisiting King's writing ...more

Like · see review

Aug 27, 2020 Brian rated it really liked it · review of another edition

3.5 stars.

This was my first King novel and I wish I had gone with the edited version. While the premise and ending were wonderful, bordering on brilliant at times, everything between should have been cut ruthlessly to keep with the pace of the story.

Like · see review