From the Bookshelf of The Readers Review: Literature from 1714 to 1910…

Anna Karenina

Leo Tolstoy

Start date: March 6, 2022

Finish date: June 11, 2022

Discussion: Leo Tolstoy Collection

Discussion leader: Gem

Why we're reading this: Group Read 03/06/22 - 06/11/22

[close] Group Read 03/06/22 - 06/11/22

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 30 topics — 532 comments total

Leo Tolstoy Collection

Anna Karenina - Reading Schedule
By Gem , Moderator · 17 posts · 117 views

last updated Jul 25, 2022 06:33AM

Anna Karenina - Week 01 / Part 1, Chapters I - XIV
By Gem , Moderator · 27 posts · 42 views

last updated Jul 24, 2022 05:29AM

showing 5 of 5 topics view all »

What Members Thought

Sep 28, 2013 Ensiform rated it really liked it

Shelves: fiction, russian

translated by Louise & Aylmer Maude

Stiva Oblonsky, an affable and slightly clueless aristocrat, has been caught cheating by his wife Dolly, and brings in his urbane married sister Anna to reconcile them. She does, but falls in love with Vronsky, a dashing roué of a military man who is courting Dolly’s younger sister Kitty. They begin a tumultuous affair, hindered by Anna’s somewhat cold, reputation-conscious husband, but the illegitimacy of their relationship causes unhappiness. Meanwhile, Levin translated by Louise & Aylmer Maude

Stiva Oblonsky, an affable and slightly clueless aristocrat, has been caught cheating by his wife Dolly, and brings in his urbane married sister Anna to reconcile them. She does, but falls in love with Vronsky, a dashing roué of a military man who is courting Dolly’s younger sister Kitty. They begin a tumultuous affair, hindered by Anna’s somewhat cold, reputation-conscious husband, but the illegitimacy of their relationship causes unhappiness. Meanwhile, Levin, a socially awkward intellectual and landowner, who is a sort of angry young man with sympathy for the working class, is also courting Kitty; when rebuffed by her, he withdraws but never forgets her. That’s a very brief synopsis of the three main plotlines in this epic novel (nearly twice the length of Moby Dick).

As the story of a troubled marriage caused by cheating, an unhappy affair, and a happy, devoted marriage, this novel is taken up by many as a moralistic cautionary tale. The polarization of the insecure but careful Levin, burning with intense but noble and innocent passion, with Anna, who is swayed by her passions without thinking of the obvious consequences, makes up the main characterization of the novel. But Tolstoy is more subtle than this simple dichotomy. There are no perfect beings in this book, there is no absolute right or wrong; it’s the practical (or impractical) decisions that people make which make them happy or unhappy, not their “inner characters.” At times, the reader sympathizes deeply with the unhappy Anna, despite the fact that her troubles are of her own making; and he continues to present Oblonsky as a sympathetic fellow, even as he puzzles over why his wife should be so upset over his philandering. Tolstoy shows that he understands human motive; whether you judge it right or wrong isn’t as important as that you know why they act as they do. This is also a novel of manners, in a way, though there are some truly profound passages in Anna Karenina that explore the fundamental questions of life. As the characters struggle with their own existentialist crises – the acceptance of society vs. following your heart, materialism vs. faith, raising up the working class vs. realizing that many of them don’t want to work hard or raise their station – how they handle those crises is what elevates them to happiness or bleak despair. Although it’s an engrossing and intelligent novel, I don’t rank it as one of my favorites. I was annoyed at times, as I can be with these stuffy characters from another era, at their infantile waffling or stubbornness. For example, Levin’s jealousy is adolescent and totally baseless, yet it consumes him at times. Anna’s insistence on going out in society, when Vronsky and all logic insist that this would be a very foolish thing to do, is baffling from a modern standpoint. And I was plain bored during some passages, such as a long tedious hunting excursion Levin goes on which doesn’t seem to have much to do with some of the grander questions he deals with. On the whole, this is a very fine novel, but to me not a Great Novel. ...more

2 likes · Like · see review

Jul 29, 2012 Denise rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: fiction, related-media

I'm glad I changed my mind about reading this. Russian literature was not attractive to me, but I found myself really getting into the politics even more than the people. The story itself is rather like a soap opera, pleasant enough to keep you reading, but without much direction. I personally enjoyed the character of Levin the most. I found his thinking interesting and it will probably lead me to further reading about Russian history. The other characters left me somewhat lukewarm, but at nearl ...more

1 like · Like · see review

Nov 17, 2010 Shawn rated it liked it · review of another edition

I’m not really sure why this book was called Anna Karenina-- this book was only marginally about her and her self destructive behaviors. To me, the book was much more about the character Levin, who felt much more interesting.

It’s a long story, that doesn’t really go very far, inspecting the characters and their choices. It was good but not great and unfortunately ended in a religious fervor congruent with its time.

Like · see review

Jan 18, 2011 Lily rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: favorites, book-club, upstairs-2c, classic

1863. Has had a special interest to me since using a selection for declamation in high school. The recent P&V translation seems very good. I also have the CDs in an earlier translation. Participated in an online discussion February-March 2008, using the CDs and still another translation.

10/10/17 For a strong review, see this one by James Hynes:

https://www.salon.com/2005/07/11/tols... ...more

Like · see review