The Age of Innocence in Reading with Style

Sep 04, 2013 Juniper rated it really liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: 2013-books, owned

"We can't behave like people in novels, though, can we?"

4.5-stars, really!!

delicious!!! this is my first wharton (I KNOW!) and while i had already held her in high esteem as a writer and a woman, this book kinda made me fall in love with her. a lot. wharton's prose is beautiful. her eye for detail, incredible. i loved her way with description - sometimes so poetic, other times hilarious and often, both!

* "...her abysmal purity..."
* "The immense accretion of flesh, which had descended on her in m ...more

5 likes · Like · see review

Dec 01, 2012 Bucket rated it really liked it

Shelves: 1001-read-all-editions, literary, culture, love, classic, reviewed, women, pulitzer-winners

Much of this novel reminded me of Pride and Prejudice. However, I like this so much better. Now, Wharton has the benefit of having written this more than 100 years later than Austen wrote Pride and Prejudice.

Wharton was also writing about a time period almost 50 years in her past, giving her the benefit of reflection and judgment - in other words, she could identify the absurdities and poke fun at them without being shocking. Austen also pokes fun at her minor characters, but the difference for ...more

Like · see review

May 28, 2013 Wendy rated it liked it · review of another edition

Shelves: classics, blooms-western-canon, 1001-books, audiobooks, pulitzer

Hmmm...virtually all my GR friends who have read this gave this book 4 or 5 stars, so I feel like I'm somehow at fault for not appreciating this one more. Maybe I should have read the book instead of listening to the audio version (the narrator Lorna Raver was brilliant, though). Did I miss a huge twist? Are my tastes immature enough that I can't fully appreciate quiet books about the idle rich? Because I really did enjoy Wharton's Ethan Frome, and I'm trying to figure out why this one seemed to Hmmm...virtually all my GR friends who have read this gave this book 4 or 5 stars, so I feel like I'm somehow at fault for not appreciating this one more. Maybe I should have read the book instead of listening to the audio version (the narrator Lorna Raver was brilliant, though). Did I miss a huge twist? Are my tastes immature enough that I can't fully appreciate quiet books about the idle rich? Because I really did enjoy Wharton's Ethan Frome, and I'm trying to figure out why this one seemed to just whiz right over my head. One big difference between Ethan and Innocence (I believe, anyway) are the stakes. In Ethan, the characters are poor, they are isolated, they are trapped by more than just social tradition, and they have very few choices. The consequences are absolutely ruinous. in Innocence, the characters are like mimes in invisible boxes, acting trapped when really, they can walk through their invisible wall at any time. Archer wants to discourage Ellen's divorce? He wants to shorten his own engagement? May knows Archer isn't "into" her and wants to keep the long engagement, but then suddenly decides to ask her parents for permission to cut it down to a month anyway? Why? If these are the decisions the characters insist on making (and it seemed to me that the changing of the engagement was ruffling feathers and going against tradition, so I don't get why these people are so terrified of feather-ruffling at other times) I can't really feel bad for them when they don't get what they want. Or, at least, don't get what they think they want. It seemed to me that they all (view spoiler) That's just how life is for any of us--*correction, the luckier of us.

I'm not trying to say that I didn't like the book, because I did, but it didn't really move me beyond mild frustration with the characters, mostly Newland Archer. Wharton's writing was lovely as usual, her descriptions evocative, and I still caught of whiff of the haunting ending, though my reaction was more like "yeah, I know, that's how it is." Perhaps I'll read this again in a few decades to see if a little aging will do me some good and give me more insight into what I've missed--because I sure as hell must be missing something. ...more

Like · see review

Oct 01, 2015 Krista rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: time-1900-1949, fiction, classsics, fiction-award-winner, 1001-read, pulitzer-prize, setting-usa, time-1850-1899, 2015-books-read, setting-usa-ny-nyc

I wonder why I put off reading this for so long? I listened to it in audiobook format and really found it to be an engaging snapshot of the strictures and nuances of the upper crust of New York City society in the late 1800's.

Poor Newland Archer. He just doesn't know which way to turn when he gets engaged to the quintessential New York City society maiden, May Welland; but finds himself getting more deeply mired in his attraction to her cousin, Ellen Olenska. Which way will he turn? Can he cut ...more

Like · see review