From the Bookshelf of Reading with Style…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

Wish I could give 3.5 stars!
I was never completely lost in this novel as I read it, in part because Eugenides is a little sloppy on details (a character has spent a certain amount of money on one page and a different amount on another without making additional purchases; a character talks on the phone for "a few minutes" and more than an hour of time disappears; etc.) and in part because of the jumping perspective. Most of the book is from Madeleine's point of view, with many sections from Mitch ...more
I was never completely lost in this novel as I read it, in part because Eugenides is a little sloppy on details (a character has spent a certain amount of money on one page and a different amount on another without making additional purchases; a character talks on the phone for "a few minutes" and more than an hour of time disappears; etc.) and in part because of the jumping perspective. Most of the book is from Madeleine's point of view, with many sections from Mitch ...more

This is a post feminist take on the "marriage plot". The story follows three Brown seniors from the class of 1982. The woman, Maddie, has options not available to Jane Austin's protagonists. On graduation day they contemplate graduate school, travel, and fellowships as well as marriage. Eugenides has a warm and easy tone. I very much appreciate his sympathetic treatment of the maniac/depressive mental illness and it's impact on the friends of the afflicted. I found his treatment of the details o
...more

Mar 30, 2011
Kathleen
marked it as to-read

Jul 15, 2011
Jane
marked it as to-read

Oct 26, 2011
Ines
marked it as to-read

Dec 19, 2011
Jenger
marked it as to-read

Dec 25, 2011
Jules
marked it as wanted-sometime

Jan 01, 2012
Athira (Reading on a Rainy Day)
marked it as to-read

Jan 07, 2012
Ligia Lesko
marked it as to-read

Jan 14, 2012
Potjy
marked it as to-find

Nov 17, 2012
Lynda
added it


Aug 15, 2013
Dana Arbelaez
marked it as to-read