What Members of Reading with Style Are Saying About…

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Kathleen (itpdx)
May 01, 2013 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is the delightful fictionalization of the story of two women, Mary Anning and Elizabeth Philpot, who contributed to the science of paleontology. Chevalier gracefully ties in the status of women in early 19th century England and the class rigidity of the time. She also through various characters brings in the difficulty that the slow realization that animals had existed and gone extinct, and the the world had not been created 6000 years ago just as it is now.
It was fun to read this after Th
...more
Donna Jo Atwood
Mary Anning was a fossil-finder par excellent. In the early 1800s she brought many bones to light, but because of her gender AND her social class in England, she was unable to really study them in a scientific way--or even to be properly credited for her finds.
Elizabeth Philpot was a middle-class woman of her times, but with an uncommon interest in searching for fossil fishes. She and Mary became unlikely friends.
Chevalier has written a fictionalized account of the beginning of this remarkable f
...more
ColleenPA
Apr 09, 2010 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: notbadbooks
Not Chevalier's best, but still an interesting account of two women who hunt fossils along the beaches of 19th century England. The novel is told alternatively from the perspective on each woman, which makes it seem rather stilted. Still, there was a lot of information about the early days of piecing together the fossil record, and the anxiety that the new information caused in some sections of polite society. ...more
Tien
I've really enjoyed the previous 2 Chevalier's I've read. Whilst I've mostly enjoyed this one, there was just a distinct lack of sparkle in this one though I would still have enjoyed it but for one incident which I thought was unnecessary. It just felt so incongruent to the overall tone of the novel plus I lost my respect for that character at that stage... Rant(view spoiler) ...more
Jennifer AM
Aug 05, 2009 rated it it was amazing
Gaijinmama
Nov 16, 2009 marked it as to-read
Lindy-Lane
Jan 16, 2010 rated it liked it
Sally
Jul 12, 2010 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Donna Jo Atwood
Aug 01, 2010 rated it liked it
Debbie Hoffman
Dec 22, 2010 marked it as to-read
Shelves: historic-bio, own
Lisa
Jan 18, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Kristina Simon
Nov 11, 2021 rated it it was amazing
Karen Michele Burns
Jul 26, 2012 rated it really liked it
Celeste
Nov 04, 2012 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Juniper
Sep 02, 2014 marked it as to-read
Jane from B.C.
Oct 25, 2014 marked it as to-read
Jenifer
Nov 18, 2014 marked it as to-read
Jen
Nov 26, 2014 marked it as to-read
Angelbis
May 24, 2017 rated it liked it
Meghan
Jun 02, 2017 marked it as to-read
maven
Jan 21, 2018 marked it as to-read
Shelves: fiction
Nick
Sep 02, 2020 rated it really liked it
Shelves: victorian
Teddie
Jan 08, 2024 marked it as to-read
Dana Arbelaez
Jul 28, 2024 marked it as to-read
« previous 1