From the Bookshelf of What's the Name of That Book???…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

As this book is considered literary sci-fi I was attracted to it but also a little concerned that in the effort to achieve literary status the author might have discarded the essence of sci-fi.
My first impressions were that the style of both the writing and the story-telling were a little old fashioned. It was lighter on the science philosophy and also less chauvanistic than such classics as Heinlein and Dick. In fact the slow, steady pace reminded me of John Windham while the constant word play ...more
My first impressions were that the style of both the writing and the story-telling were a little old fashioned. It was lighter on the science philosophy and also less chauvanistic than such classics as Heinlein and Dick. In fact the slow, steady pace reminded me of John Windham while the constant word play ...more

Apr 07, 2014
HeavyReader
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
sciencefiction
A friend sent me this book, and I had it in my to-read pile for quite some time before picking it up and starting to read it.
Oh! My! Goodness! It grabbed me by the collar and didn't let me go until I read the last page (and the preview of the next book in the trilogy). Some nights I could barely keep my eyes open, but I needed to keep reading.
Some of the science was over my head and I didn't always follow the plot twists, but the writing was such that I just kept going.
I've read other novels a ...more
Oh! My! Goodness! It grabbed me by the collar and didn't let me go until I read the last page (and the preview of the next book in the trilogy). Some nights I could barely keep my eyes open, but I needed to keep reading.
Some of the science was over my head and I didn't always follow the plot twists, but the writing was such that I just kept going.
I've read other novels a ...more

A book which doesn't fit neatly onto any of the shelves I've created! How odd. I added it to "science fiction" after some deliberation, but don't be fooled into thinking this will read like Asimov or Heinlein. Rather, this is a poetic, mysterious dystopian novel, drawing on themes of genetic manipulation and human pride. This is a very different future than the one Atwood imagined in "The Handmaid's Tale," but one that is equally as compelling.
...more

I love this book. I just finished reading it for the third time and it never disappoints, in fact, it becomes more scarily accurate each time I read it. The dystopia Atwood creates is so familiar, so almost what things are like now, that I can't help but get totally sucked into this story as if reading my own future. And it's just so well-written, so imaginative and wonderful.
...more

ORYX & CRAKE: NOTES
• Jimmy (Snowman) a word person, not a numbers person (25)
• Pigoon: “neither he nor they had a lot of say in what was going on” (24)
• Compound people (27)
• When mother enjoyed herself—felt like she was a real mother, and Jimmy a real child (30)—“he loved her so when he made her unhappy” (33)
• Oryx and her “someone” (38)
• Losing words/meaning (39)
• Crake/Crakers (40)
• Building—so much time and effort, only to crumble, disintegrate (45)
• Feels he has a listener (46)
• Dad (and Ra ...more
• Jimmy (Snowman) a word person, not a numbers person (25)
• Pigoon: “neither he nor they had a lot of say in what was going on” (24)
• Compound people (27)
• When mother enjoyed herself—felt like she was a real mother, and Jimmy a real child (30)—“he loved her so when he made her unhappy” (33)
• Oryx and her “someone” (38)
• Losing words/meaning (39)
• Crake/Crakers (40)
• Building—so much time and effort, only to crumble, disintegrate (45)
• Feels he has a listener (46)
• Dad (and Ra ...more

Jun 29, 2007
Wiltshire Hermit
rated it
really liked it
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
fiction,
booker-books

Aug 01, 2009
Erin
marked it as to-read

Sep 15, 2011
Brandie
marked it as to-read

Feb 14, 2012
April
marked it as to-read

Mar 25, 2012
Gary
marked it as to-read

Jun 13, 2012
Meg
marked it as to-read

Aug 06, 2013
Lisa
marked it as to-read

Dec 30, 2014
Annie
marked it as to-read


Feb 13, 2017
Casey
marked it as to-read

Jun 29, 2017
Natalie
marked it as to-read

Apr 23, 2019
Rachel
marked it as to-read