From the Bookshelf of What's the Name of That Book???

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Esther
As this book is considered literary sci-fi I was attracted to it but also a little concerned that in the effort to achieve literary status the author might have discarded the essence of sci-fi.

My first impressions were that the style of both the writing and the story-telling were a little old fashioned. It was lighter on the science philosophy and also less chauvanistic than such classics as Heinlein and Dick. In fact the slow, steady pace reminded me of John Windham while the constant word play
...more
HeavyReader
Apr 07, 2014 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: sciencefiction
A friend sent me this book, and I had it in my to-read pile for quite some time before picking it up and starting to read it.

Oh! My! Goodness! It grabbed me by the collar and didn't let me go until I read the last page (and the preview of the next book in the trilogy). Some nights I could barely keep my eyes open, but I needed to keep reading.

Some of the science was over my head and I didn't always follow the plot twists, but the writing was such that I just kept going.

I've read other novels a
...more
Elizabeth McDonald
Jan 31, 2013 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: science-fiction
A book which doesn't fit neatly onto any of the shelves I've created! How odd. I added it to "science fiction" after some deliberation, but don't be fooled into thinking this will read like Asimov or Heinlein. Rather, this is a poetic, mysterious dystopian novel, drawing on themes of genetic manipulation and human pride. This is a very different future than the one Atwood imagined in "The Handmaid's Tale," but one that is equally as compelling. ...more
Jenny Fosket
Sep 03, 2011 rated it it was amazing
I love this book. I just finished reading it for the third time and it never disappoints, in fact, it becomes more scarily accurate each time I read it. The dystopia Atwood creates is so familiar, so almost what things are like now, that I can't help but get totally sucked into this story as if reading my own future. And it's just so well-written, so imaginative and wonderful. ...more
kvon
Aug 05, 2014 rated it really liked it
Shelves: digital, book-club
Genetic mad science gone mad (eg rakunks). Unchecked corporate greed. Psychopathy kills humanity. Extensive flashbacks. Gods, do guys really spend that much time thinking about breasts?
Misha
Dec 27, 2011 rated it really liked it
Shelves: dystopian
ORYX & CRAKE: NOTES

• Jimmy (Snowman) a word person, not a numbers person (25)
• Pigoon: “neither he nor they had a lot of say in what was going on” (24)
• Compound people (27)
• When mother enjoyed herself—felt like she was a real mother, and Jimmy a real child (30)—“he loved her so when he made her unhappy” (33)
• Oryx and her “someone” (38)
• Losing words/meaning (39)
• Crake/Crakers (40)
• Building—so much time and effort, only to crumble, disintegrate (45)
• Feels he has a listener (46)
• Dad (and Ra
...more
Karol
Sep 18, 2025 rated it really liked it
The point is that the world is in trouble, right? But then there’s the sweet tender way that Snowman takes care of the Crakers.
Kay
Jun 25, 2007 rated it liked it
Kelly
Jun 26, 2007 rated it it was amazing
Shelves: favorites, fiction
Jessica
Jul 12, 2007 rated it really liked it
Shelves: canadian
Ray
Oct 17, 2007 rated it really liked it
Kristin
Nov 09, 2007 rated it it was ok
Sharon
Dec 27, 2007 marked it as to-read
Shelves: plr
Kathe
Jan 24, 2008 rated it it was amazing
Erin
Aug 01, 2009 marked it as to-read
Zack
Oct 13, 2009 rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Alisa
Feb 28, 2011 rated it liked it
Brandie
Sep 15, 2011 marked it as to-read
April
Feb 14, 2012 marked it as to-read
Gary
Mar 25, 2012 marked it as to-read
Meg
Jun 13, 2012 marked it as to-read
Lisa
Aug 06, 2013 marked it as to-read
Annie
Dec 30, 2014 marked it as to-read
Michelle
Jan 02, 2016 rated it liked it
Shelves: fiction, book-club
Casey
Feb 13, 2017 marked it as to-read
Natalie
Jun 29, 2017 marked it as to-read
Rachel
Apr 23, 2019 marked it as to-read