From the Bookshelf of On Paths Unknown…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
No group discussions for this book yet.
What Members Thought

“ “Us two? All three of us are in this. If we don’t come out honorably, we’ll all look silly.”
“Silly to whom?”
“Why, to history. Before the tribunal of Truth.”
“Quid est veritas?” Belbo asked.
“Us,” I said.” ” (p.435)
Truth? What is truth? Truth is relative. Or isn’t it?
The fact that Umberto Eco portrays one of his characters quoting Pontius Pilate’s assertion that truth is hard to ascertain with some sort of consistent resonance of a Nietzschian Superman who has passed “beyond good and evil” ...more
“Silly to whom?”
“Why, to history. Before the tribunal of Truth.”
“Quid est veritas?” Belbo asked.
“Us,” I said.” ” (p.435)
Truth? What is truth? Truth is relative. Or isn’t it?
The fact that Umberto Eco portrays one of his characters quoting Pontius Pilate’s assertion that truth is hard to ascertain with some sort of consistent resonance of a Nietzschian Superman who has passed “beyond good and evil” ...more

Umberto Eco distinguished professor of semiology delivers to us after "the name of the rose" a new labyrinthian book (one compared Eco with Borges?). It is question of Kabbale with luminous flash. It is known there was a Christian Kabbale with Pic of Mirandole, Italian érudit like Eco.
I let to you discover the advance of the search by reading. Inform you about the trees sefirotic and the paths to appreciate the book. The end is brilliant. In the gothic nef of Saint-Martin-in-the-fields in Paris, ...more
I let to you discover the advance of the search by reading. Inform you about the trees sefirotic and the paths to appreciate the book. The end is brilliant. In the gothic nef of Saint-Martin-in-the-fields in Paris, ...more

In the age of the Internet rabbit hole and conspiracy-theory as legion-religion, you'd think that a playful rip on all of that would make for a wonderfully funny novel. Unfortunately, Eco follows up the magisterial "Name of the Rose" with this rather flat joke of a book that seems to defy willful criticism by making clear that it is a joke. That's fine. Eco was a semioticist, whatever you want to think that means, and there is much of game and symbol in his thought. Does that necessarily transla
...more

Umberto Eco's sharp, meticulously detailed novel feels like a better, satirical version of Dan Brown's The Da Vinci Code (a book I enjoyed when I read it several years ago), despite the fact that Eco's novel was published fifteen years before Brown's. Foucault's Pendulum is a multilayered thriller that offers and challenging, enjoyable and meaningful reading experience. I suspect that even the parts I thought dragged a bit would offer new insights on a second reading.
And Eco's take on conspiracy ...more
And Eco's take on conspiracy ...more

Dec 02, 2013
Carmen Cocar
marked it as to-read

Dec 21, 2013
Himanshu
marked it as to-read


Oct 05, 2014
Daniel
marked it as to-read

Mar 03, 2015
blumine
marked it as to-read

Jun 28, 2015
Addicted to Books
marked it as to-read
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
1praj-shelves


Aug 11, 2015
Mercurialgem
marked it as to-read

Oct 09, 2015
MuseOfTroy
marked it as to-read

Nov 26, 2015
Ahmed Hilmy
marked it as to-read

Feb 22, 2016
Frances
marked it as to-read

Apr 11, 2016
Ankit Goyal
marked it as to-read

Sep 09, 2017
Safeeq
marked it as to-read

Jan 16, 2020
María Alejandra
marked it as to-read