From the Bookshelf of Book Riot's Read Harder Challenge…

The Color of Law: A Forgotten History of How Our Government Segregated America

Richard Rothstein

Start date: January 15, 2021

Finish date: February 1, 2021

Discussion: 2021 Read Harder Challenge

Find A Copy At

Libraries

Group Discussions About This Book

Showing 2 of 34 topics — 2,760 comments total

2021 Read Harder Challenge

This topic has been closed to new comments.

* 2021 Read Harder Challenge
By Book Riot · 1 post · 4150 views

last updated Dec 04, 2020 12:08PM

Task 21: Read a children’s book that centers a disabled character but not their disability
By Book Riot · 79 posts · 1590 views

last updated Sep 25, 2022 09:27AM

What Members Thought

Jan 03, 2021 superawesomekt rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: american-history

Updating my rating to 5 stars because I can't stop thinking about and recommending this book. Really, you should read it.

One of the best books I've read so far on race in the US. I prefer a historical / fact based study as opposed to lectures and sermons, and this one absolutely delivered. It's a highly focused, compact account of official and unofficial housing, unionization, and property tax policies that boxed out African Americans during the most significant era of suburbanization in the US— Updating my rating to 5 stars because I can't stop thinking about and recommending this book. Really, you should read it.

One of the best books I've read so far on race in the US. I prefer a historical / fact based study as opposed to lectures and sermons, and this one absolutely delivered. It's a highly focused, compact account of official and unofficial housing, unionization, and property tax policies that boxed out African Americans during the most significant era of suburbanization in the US—effectively locking in segregated communities—and restricted their comparative ability to increase wealth. Humanity's obsession with status and exclusion is on full display here. This book definitely turned upside down many of my casual assumptions about segregated neighborhoods and I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to study the politics of race in the US.

Some of my personal Notes:
At p. 76
While some may argue that the refusal to insure / grant FHA loans to non-whites was simply based on property values/risk assessments, or at worst just reflective of the cultural norms, what I find most infuriating is that, in my opinion, one of the chief roles of government is to regulate what human incentives get wrong—some (unrelated to housing) examples: restrict pollution and other negative externalities; standardize nutritional information on processed foods, and so on—and in this case where they should have been regulating against discrimination, they were instead fostering and promoting it. Seems like it would have been better for the government to have not been involved with housing at all. They should have just stayed out of housing (except for regulating non-discrimination policies). I'm definitely of the mind that more programs should be privatized (still with government oversight/accountability) and this history just reinforces that.

at p. 35
As much as the codification of segregated housing appalls me, what's worse is how the communities responded to the courts overturning it. Ceasing to build housing altogether, providing vouchers for private housing to whites, giving local groups the ability to veto proposed projects, etc. Obviously the culture in power was rejecting integration and refused to accept government intervention--which makes me wonder, how does a government legislate ethically what a people reject? Do you give some space and time for the people to come around, but prosecute any violation of the law? Do you give in to the racist majority? Do you try to strong-arm through it and risk the rebellious response of the group you're trying to reach? I never took a public policy class in college, so maybe I would be able to fathom this if I had. It seems to me (from both personal experience and as a student of history) that forcing / controlling people doesn't really work, but I don't think a government or court is justified in giving in to unethical laws, either. Ugh. What I do know is that division is ugly and I know it offends God. ...more

4 likes · Like · see review

Nov 03, 2020 Susanne Clower rated it it was amazing · review of another edition

Shelves: nonfiction, politics, american-history, economics, political-must-read, human-history, civil-rights, history, social-issues

I skimmed this. I really wanted to read it and I think it is an important book, but it is very dry and I just couldn't settle into it right now. Maybe at another time I'll be able to concentrate on it and really read every page. It isn't all that long; the text is only a bit over 200 pages with the research notes making up the rest of the pages. ...more

Like · see review