From the Bookshelf of Book Riot's Read Harder Challenge

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Jess
Oct 24, 2017 rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2017
More than 90 percent of this book takes place in the 1500s, and while I preferred the world built in A Discovery of Witches, this book really explores some of the central questions of the book and helps move Diana along in her development as a witch.

A few things that I found a bit problematic are time continuity/continuum and the fact that the very reason for going back to the 1500s was pretty significantly downplayed. That being said, I can't wait to get started on book 3!
...more
Shannon
Jul 04, 2012 rated it liked it
Shadow of Night, the sequel to A Discovery of Witches, was a bit of a disappointment. Unlike the first book, which introduced us to Harkness' freshly imagined take on a world populated with witches, daemons and vampires, this book read like historical fiction with a splash of the supernatural thrown in. Add to that the failure of the two main characters to be authentic and I was left wanting more (even as I read all 600+ pages).

Fans of Diana Gabaldon's Outlander series might find this book intri
...more
Jaime
This second book picks up almost exactly where Discovery of Witches leaves off, with Diana and Matthew traveling through time, hoping to land in late 1500s London. They have two main goals -- find Ashmole 782 and a witch they can trust to teach Diana about her powers -- but these are made difficult by the need to not only dodge the existing version of Matthew, but to convince everyone around them that present-day Matthew is the one they know.

I enjoyed this, but I wish the story had moved along a
...more
Kim
Oct 04, 2012 rated it liked it
The magic, I like. The history, I like. The main characters grew on me somewhat- I liked a number of supporting characters better- but the romance aspects were kind of annoying (we get it, vampires are possessive and controlling. Whatever). And the ending is a little abrupt and slightly confusing, unless it's partly that I'm not remember the end of book 1 clearly. But, it's not bad and I'll most likely read book 3, if for no other reason that the author gets the scholarship aspects really right ...more
Elizabeth
Apr 06, 2013 rated it liked it
I really wanted to love this book. Everything about it felt like it was setting up to be one of my favorite books ever. Diana Bishop and Matthew de Clermont heading back in time to Elizabethan England so she can learn about her magic?? Yes, please! Unfortunately, this book did not come close to what I was expecting. Nothing happened. It felt like an exercise in "look at the research I did." All sorts of historical figures show up, but dont really do much for plot. (Queen Elizabeth had bad teeth! ...more
Kate
Jun 22, 2012 rated it it was amazing


Jana
Jun 11, 2012 marked it as to-read
Sarah
Jul 11, 2012 rated it liked it
Jeanne Bufkin
Aug 09, 2012 marked it as to-read
Joseph
Aug 15, 2012 rated it it was amazing
Aimee
Oct 26, 2012 rated it really liked it
Nichole
May 02, 2013 rated it liked it
Shelves: 2012
Jenny
Aug 15, 2013 rated it really liked it
Paloma
Sep 16, 2013 marked it as to-read
Sarah left GR
Apr 04, 2014 rated it liked it
Shelves: fiction, series
Erika
Jun 10, 2015 marked it as to-read
Rebecca Fumia Patel
Jul 08, 2015 rated it it was amazing
Natalie
Apr 19, 2018 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Emrys
Nov 28, 2017 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Maggie
Sep 27, 2018 rated it liked it
Andrea Thatcher
Aug 18, 2019 rated it really liked it
Shelves: audiobooks
Alison
Mar 07, 2020 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Gina Heil
Jun 09, 2020 marked it as to-read
Shelves: next-in-series
Brekke
Feb 07, 2021 rated it liked it
Cassandra
Jul 21, 2021 marked it as to-read
Nancy
Aug 25, 2021 rated it really liked it