From the Bookshelf of Book Riot's Read Harder Challenge

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Kerry
Apr 27, 2019 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was my first Mary Roach book. She's just as great as everyone says! I know a lot more about cadavers now. I've also changed my mind about what I want done with my body when I die: instead of being buried without being embalmed (which was my first plan), I'd like to donate my body to science. You can use me for basically anything I guess except arms and ammunition testing. That's assuming, of course, that I wasn't able to donate my organs. If that's the case, then please bury what's left wit ...more
Molly
I chose this for the Microhistory task in the Read Harder challenge. I've been wanting to/meaning to read it forever, so this gave me the perfect excuse. (Sidebar: I'm kind of loving this challenge; it's really forced me to get outside of my standard comfort zone)

Having listened to Packing for Mars, I already had a sense of Roach's style, and I've heard that this is the best of her books. There were times that Packing sort of lost my interest (that's the double-edged sword of the audiobook, you

...more
Melissa
Not quite as good as Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex, IMO, but a very solid, readable first book from Mary Roach. She gets off track here and there (and dead people aren't quite as funny as ghosts, sex, or being in space) but there's a whole of stuff that can happen to you if you donate your body after death. I did think it was nice that she included a chapter on organ donation. ...more
Allie
Good aside from the Dr Oz jumpscare in the middle. One quibble though is that the narrator mispronounced quite a lot of words. Two notable (funny) examples are the news agency Reuters (rooters) and an accelerometer (accelero-meter).
Bridget
Mar 29, 2016 rated it liked it
Very interesting and also quite amusing. It was a bit long considering the morbid topic.
Donna
Nov 21, 2016 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction
While a book about the use of human cadavers might sound gruesome, in reality this was no more gruesome than some crime fiction. In addition, you learn many things about the science of decomposition.

Three words: narrative-science, black-humor, dead-bodies

Read alikes: police procedurals with medical examiners, forensic anthropologists, etc.
Kate
Apr 16, 2010 rated it really liked it
Maya
Aug 10, 2010 marked it as to-read
Bridget
Jan 11, 2011 marked it as to-read
Teresa
Apr 10, 2011 rated it really liked it
Shelves: informative
Allison
Jun 02, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Cindy
Aug 04, 2011 rated it did not like it
Kim Lacey
Aug 28, 2011 rated it it was amazing
Erica
Sep 22, 2011 marked it as to-read
Sandy
Jul 04, 2012 rated it really liked it
Samantha
Aug 14, 2012 rated it really liked it
Shelves: favorites
Grace
Jun 26, 2016 marked it as to-read
Elizabeth
Jul 09, 2016 marked it as to-read
Heather
Sep 03, 2016 marked it as to-read
Jamie Dornfeld
Nov 13, 2016 marked it as undecided-or-not-interested
gremlinkitten
May 18, 2017 marked it as to-read-own
Nic
Feb 17, 2018 marked it as to-read
Shelves: tbr-nonfiction
Cas
Oct 26, 2018 marked it as to-read
Slynne
Feb 21, 2019 marked it as to-read
Chelsea
Apr 30, 2019 marked it as to-read