From the Bookshelf of Espionage Aficionados

Find A Copy At

Group Discussions About This Book

No group discussions for this book yet.

What Members Thought

Nooilforpacifists
Sep 30, 2016 rated it really liked it
Shelves: thriller
It's hard to believe this was Deighton's first book. Had I written something as clever, sarcastic, and thrilling as this, I would have stopped there, and admired myself in the mirror for a decade. Good thing Len didn't--this book gets scrambled at the end. By contrast, by the time he hit his stride in the three Bernard Sampson trilogies, there wasn't a hair out of place.

Deighton didn't go to Eton; he's not an Oxbridge grad. But he read like a madman, had some Toff friends, and must have the ret
...more
Michael Martz
Aug 15, 2020 rated it liked it
I've become a Len Deighton fan since making my way through a few of his spy trilogies. He's a solid writer with great characters and a seemingly up-to-date knowledge of the spy game. I reached back nearly 60 years into his extensive catalog to check out his initial foray into the genre, 'The Ipcress File', and it was interesting to see from whence he came. It was supposedly a very hot novel when first released, but it's pretty dated language wise, the plot is confusing, and the conclusion a litt ...more
Dan J Ford
Sep 22, 2022 rated it it was amazing
There is no series quite like Len Deighton’s ‘Harry Palmer’ foursome that begins with ‘The IPCRESS File’.

The book was recently adapted into a mini series, preceded by the 1965 film starring Michael Caine, unfortunately, neither do the written original justice. Deighton’s protagonists is the perfect, tongue in cheek, cynical and witty British spy. The series is plotted like four substantial bites of a favourite meal, but it’s the dialogue that sets this series far and above so many other ‘Brit-sp
...more
Andy Lancelot
Feb 04, 2017 rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It was enjoyable but to be honest not as much as I’d thought. I’m a huge fan of the Michael Caine film and although aware that there were differences I was still looking forward to reading the book. I think it was the writing style that I didn’t quite get on with in parts, but once used to it I felt it was an enjoyable read.
Sirius Alexander
Aug 28, 2015 marked it as to-read
Mac_dickenson
Dec 21, 2015 marked it as to-read
Brian
Jan 20, 2016 rated it it was amazing
Enrico
Feb 09, 2016 rated it really liked it
Mike Price
Mar 13, 2016 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fiction
Greg Coppin
Apr 03, 2016 rated it really liked it
Stephen Boiko
Jul 07, 2016 marked it as to-read
Tom
Oct 21, 2017 rated it liked it
Gary
Dec 17, 2017 rated it liked it
R.G.
Feb 13, 2018 rated it it was amazing
James
Nov 16, 2024 rated it liked it
Jon Gertler
Jan 11, 2021 rated it really liked it
Anthony Spencer
Sep 14, 2018 rated it really liked it
Scott
Jul 03, 2019 marked it as to-read
Marcella Wigg
Apr 20, 2021 marked it as to-read
Caroline
May 09, 2021 marked it as to-read
Tim
Jan 04, 2022 rated it really liked it
Jonathan Payne
May 03, 2022 marked it as to-read
Trent P. Roddy
Jan 11, 2025 rated it really liked it
Farhan Baig
Feb 17, 2023 marked it as to-read
KOsie
Jan 23, 2024 marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Adam Reed
Jan 11, 2025 rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Marija Korac
Apr 13, 2025 is currently reading it
Shelves: cold-war