Thomas’s
Comments
(group member since Jan 14, 2013)
Thomas’s
comments
from the Classics Without All the Class group.
Showing 1-19 of 19

"There was no denying that Dorothea was as virtuous and lovely a young lady as he could have obtained for a wife; but a young lady turned out to be something more troublesome than he had conceived."

"when a youthful nobleman steals jewellery we call the act kleptomania, speak of it with a philosophical smile, and never think of his being sent to the house of correction as if he were a ragged boy who had stolen turnips."

From chapter IX:
"the mistakes that we male and female mortals make when we have our own way might fairly raise some wonder that we are so fond of it."


"The mistakes we male and female mortals make when we have our own way might fairly raise some wonder that we are so fond of it."

Jul 07, 2014 04:22AM


I was a bit thrown at first by the fact that the title characters aren't introduced until almost a third of the way through the novel. Even when they are introduced, they aren't the ones driving the plot forward. Although the story ultimately revolves around what happens to them, and why, they are more minor characters than protagonists; especially the unnamed Master.
The structure is also very non-typical. Part 1 seems a fairly typical farce, showing the reactions of characters placed in unusual, and highly uncomfortable, situations. Although very funny satire, I wasn't sure where the story was going. Part 2 changes to pure fantasy, as Margarita decides to take Woland up on his Faustian bargain in order to free the Master.
For me, the story was very much about perception and reality, and how people try to control other people's perceptions in order to create their own version of reality.

Jan 11, 2014 11:45AM

Jean, this sounds very similar to what I do. I completely respect those who can set a numeric goal and stick to it, for me, though, it puts reading into the category of "stressful things I have to do this year".
Instead of setting a numeric goal, I pick a type of book I want to focus on for the year and look for recommendations on Amazon, here on Goodreads, from award lists, from NPR, etc. I then add them in with other books I've put on my To-Read list here on Goodreads and prioritize them.
When I'm ready for a new book, I pick the next one from my To-Read list -- unless a book not on the list has caught my attention in the meantime. ;-)

As some others seemed to suggest, I don't think I would have heard of this book if it weren't for CWAtC, so I'm glad it was chosen this month.

Oh, whoops, actually I remember now that's what got me to read the book. I had just found this group and hadn't introduced myself or joined in the discussion, but saw you were reading it and thought it looked interesting. Turns out it was! ;-)

I've also been wanting to read some John Green so that sounds good to me too.






The last one has the advantage of containing a reference to this month's reading of Sherlock Holmes! ;-)

Way too many favorite books and authors to pick a favorite but I tend to prefer 19th and 20th century American and British literature. Recently I've been reading a lot of historical fiction (especially Bernard Cornwell!) but I like to mix it up with classics as well as science fiction and fantasy.
I joined Goodreads last year but only recently started exploring some of the groups, mostly as a way to get more book recommendations. I had been wanting to read Life of Pi sometime anyway so seeing that this group was reading it this month, decided to join in. I'm very glad I did. I finished the book last night and thoroughly enjoyed it. Looking forward to reading more books with this group.
My favorite word is to blave.

Thanks so much for picking this book to read. I'm looking forward to reading more books with this group!

I just finished reading the book for the first time last night. During the first part, I had thoughts very similar to what I see from many other posters here. It was interesting reading his thoughts on religion, zoos, and animals but it wasn't blowing me away.
Now that I'm done, I want to reread it. I'm sure Martin is right that I would get much more out of the second reading of Part 1 now that I know where the book is going.
Martin wrote: "When he's talking about animals he's actually talking about people"
Indeed. I also think now that Pi's thoughts on zoos being "better" than freedom in the wild is a metaphor for what we do to ourselves with religion. Are we better off allowing ourselves to be constrained by religion or being truly "free" and recognizing the frequently bleak reality of an existence without God? I suspect I would get a lot more out of rereading Part 1 with this in mind.