Garima’s
Comments
(group member since Aug 11, 2012)
Garima’s
comments
from the Infinite Jest – David Foster Wallace group.
Showing 21-40 of 45

Kill Bill was the first thought that struck my mind while reading about the Blood sister and LOL at the horrible bosses reference.
About 'Caius Is Mortal' this is what wallace wiki suggests:
This is a variation on an older Greek syllogism used to demonstrate deductive logic:
Major Premise: All men are mortal
Minor Premise: Caius is a man
Conclusion: Caius is mortal
Caius was Julius Caesar's first name.
Also I found Poor Tony being chased by Ruth scene hilarious.

Hope you're still interested in knowing this Sunny! So the claim was filed by Mr. Doony R. Glynn and there is a mention of the accident on page 543.

There is an end note with it that either it's a spelling mistake or Quebecois solecism.
On Page 510, there is reference to Nabokov's Lolita in relation to coach R.Billy and how one Dr. Dolores Rusk keeps check on young girls not to be victimized of any kind of paedophylic episodes.

It's a critical view of course but definitely one that I found interesting and with book this encyclopedic, there tend to exists varied thoughts and interpretations.


"NNYC's harbor's Liberty Island's gigantic Lady has the sun for a crown and holds what looks like a huge photo album under one iron..."
It's an interesting passage. And I agree with your point of corporatism too.

It features on page 139 in my IJ copy and yes! it's hilarious. And here's a link that will throw some light on that part: http://infinitesummer.org/archives/608

http://infinitejest.wallacewiki.com/d...

1) Hal's communication issues. When we f..."
As for Hal's communication issues in the beginning, it is from year of glad, so keep your eyes on those years.

That's great and you'll be joined with many others I reckon.

Shall I happily assume that you're reading IJ Megha?

Agreed! I loved Kate's part. Though many other favorite sections followed thereafter.


It's an ambiguous term for me too and gets all the more confused whenever I try to understand it. Going by this list: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_...
I'm mostly reading post-modern literature but now Mitchell doesn't feature in it so there! more confusion.Wallace comes under the literary movements like Postmodern literature, hysterical realism, metamodernism i.e post-postmodernism which can be applied to his essays and since I'm yet to read a huge part of IJ, I really can't say how 'modern' it is.

He explained that endnotes “allow . . . .."
Where is the quote from?
He certainly got #2 correct and #4 is a reason to read the book and not use ..."
It's from The New Yorker article Jim. Here's the link
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/20...

If this will be of any help Mala:
He explained that endnotes “allow . . . me to make the primary-text an easier read while at once 1) allowing a discursive, authorial intrusive style w/o Finneganizing the story, 2) mimic the information-flood and data-triage I expect’d be an even bigger part of US life 15 years hence. 3) have a lot more technical/medical verisimilitude 4) allow/make the reader go literally physically ‘back and forth’ in a way that perhaps cutely mimics some of the story’s thematic concerns . . . 5) feel emotionally like I’m satisfying your request for compression of text without sacrificing enormous amounts of stuff.” He also said, “I pray this is nothing like hypertext, but it seems to be interesting and the best way to get the exfoliating curve-line plot I wanted.”

Same here Melody. Till now I've experienced less panic attacks (or none actually) with the help of that wiki.

What do you mean one never knows? Are you telling me that there are people in this world who don't read the same book multiple t..."
I don't believe it either. I wish you multiple re-readings of this book with and without end notes.

Hope you'll soon get great deal of time to relax and read more Kris. And also take care of yourself to gear up for the Christmas :)

I don't think so there is any fun without those endnotes, especially like that 9 page long footnote and many others and one never know if there will be a second-time ;) :)
Kris wrote: "That's right -- I was too lazy to add relevant page ranges for notes and errata. I'm assuming people will discuss notes in the sections for the relevant pages. If there's a better way to do it, please let me know! .."
Yes Kris! notes can be discussed as they appear along those page ranges, that would be most convenient.