Jim’s
Comments
(group member since Jun 25, 2012)
Jim’s
comments
from the Q&A with James Maxey group.
Showing 1-4 of 4

As much as Infidel winds up in various fanservicey situations (bathing, clothes too tight or skirt too short, the chainmail bikini, etc...) she herself is not a sexual being. At least she is never do such things for the intent of titillation or to catch the eye of anyone. Even when she was in the company of the man she loved, she never paid special attention to her appearance.
Judicious Merchant is not presented in a sexual life. Her is "going native" Had Lord Tower ended up in nothing but a gourd and had the narrator (Stagger) given loving attention to his form (or even just Stagger noticing Infidel noticing) then we might be a little closer to a logical comparison.

Do you find people connecting more to the fantastical elements of your worlds? (multiple planes of existence brought into being by belief) or the most reality aspects of your fantasy world? (how magic in Bitterwood was discovered to be the work of nanobots)
Did you feel influenced from the mythology of other works? I notice Pratchett's Discworld also has a variety of afterlives based upon the personal beliefs of those dying.

Why do you write so many stories with a POV character who does not / cannot physically interact with the events that surround them? (Nobody, Stagger, Silent as Dust)
