Lichen’s
Comments
(group member since Feb 09, 2012)
Lichen’s
comments
from the Lichen Craig Q and A group.
Showing 1-4 of 4

Typical questions:
Do you write daily?
Well, yes. Pretty much. Not because I have to, but because for me writing is like breathing. If I am not physically putting words on paper, I am working on marketing.
Do you write an outline first?
For non-fiction always. For fiction, no. Many fiction writers do write and follow an outline, but a minority find that doesn't work and I am one of those. I tend to be, rather, very character-driven. I have to form a character in my head first. By the time I start writing I know this character's background, personality, preferences, fears, joys. The stronger and deeper the character is the better I write. I find that a strong character tells the story to me and I write it down.
One interesting aspect of working in this fashion is that sometimes characters do things I don't want them to. Those who have read Gentlemen's Game will be interested to know that I had no idea what was going to happen in Chapter 14 until about Chapter 7. I woke up one morning and knew what would happen, and wrote 14. This is one of the few times I wrote out of chronological order. I also did not know what would happen in Chapter 21 - the last chapter of the book. I was in the middle of it when The Scene started (those familiar with the book know what scene I mean!) - I thought "Greyson what are you doing?" I was horrified.
But this is the thing: if I try to force my characters into an action or direction that they don't want to go naturally, my writing stinks. I have to give them a long leash and stay out of their way. A few different famous writers have discussed this phenomenon - that of the character taking over. Most memorably Stephen King wrote a short story about a character coming after the author with a vengeance - Johnny Depp starred in the film.
Has anyone written a strong character that then wanted to tell a story? I would love to hear about your experience!


At first this sort of freaked me out. I don't expect everyone to like it, but so far reader feedback is overwhelmingly positive. It got me thinking about the nature of fiction. This book actually has a positive ending, but it is a hard road getting there. Does fiction always have to be positive? What about "disturbing"? Is that all right - as this reader suggested - if the reader is provoked to think, reconsider, learn?
It also got me thinking about romance fiction. This is not a genre romance by any stretch. It is an unusual story and doesn't fit neatly into the romance category. For one thing, it is about two men - who do not identify as gay. They stumble upon one another and fall in love - much to their own surprise. It isn't a typical gay romance. One issue I think the above reader may be having is that she has read a lot of M/M slash and formula gay romance, and this is totally different. What about romance? Does it need to be anything in particular? Does it need to fit a genre? Are you more comfortable when it does?