Judy’s
Comments
(group member since Oct 01, 2015)
Judy’s
comments
from the Reading the Detectives group.
Showing 1,801-1,820 of 11,231

My favourite was Malice Aforethought by Francis Iles aka Anthony Berkeley. I possibly wasn't expecting to enjoy this one as much as I did, as I don't always enjoy inverted mysteries where readers see through the eyes of a killer, but I really enjoyed Berkeley's sarcastic style in this. I agree with Pamela that it was quite creepy. I had already read a few books by Berkeley and hope to read some more.
I also really enjoyed The Missing Partners by Henry Wade, and wanted to read another by him, but didn't like the one I tried, The Duke of York's Steps, which is supposed to be one of his best and mentioned in Martin Edwards' book The Story of Classic Crime in 100 Books. I will probably still try more by him though.
I also enjoyed the Crofts and Cyril Hare books - they were both authors that I already liked. My least favourite was probably Death in Fancy Dress, as I felt it rather fizzled out.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

Have you discovered any authors you haven't previously tried who you want to explore further?
As a reminder, here is a list of the books in the challenge. We also had a buddy read of The Golden Age of Murder by Martin Edwards before starting, and our current group read, The Floating Admiral, also ties in with the theme as a "round robin" book written by members of the Detection Club.
Jan: The Hollow Man - John Dickson Carr
Feb: Inspector French's Greatest Case - Freeman Wills Crofts
March: The Three Taps: A Detective Story Without a Moral - Ronald Knox
April: Tragedy at Law - Cyril Hare
May: Whose Body? - Dorothy L. Sayers
June: Murder at Monk's Barn - Cecil Waye
July: The Red Thumb Mark - R. Austin Freeman
August: Malice Aforethought - Francis Iles
September: The Studio Crime - Ianthe Jerrold
October: The Missing Partners - Henry Wade
November: Death in Fancy Dress - Anthony Gilbert
December: Hercule Poirot's Christmas - Agatha Christie


Good point, that vital plot point should have been the baseline."
I agree with this. The sheer number of clues and characters does become confusing!
I've started reading The Sinking Admiral, published a few years ago, which was jointly written by 14 current Detection Club members but followed a different system which Simon Brett describes in the introduction. They worked together more closely and didn't write separate chapters, although they still finally agreed on the killer quite late on.
I'm enjoying it so far. Apparently there will be some moments of tribute to the original book, which I wonder if I'll spot. The only problem with this system is that you don't know which writer's work you are reading!


Sorry Michaela, not much use to you for this read, but just in case it is any help to anyone for future reads, I've also bought a few of this series as old paperbacks via Ebay.


https://www.goodreads.com/poll/show/2...

https://www.goodreads.com/poll/show/2...


I thought the first few authors had a similar style and it all flowed quite smoothly, then Agatha Christie's chapter stood out with some good humour involving the talkative landlady, but John Rhode slowed things down with all the information about the tide times, even though I've enjoyed some of his own books a lot.

I think it is clever, though, how Christie drops lots of clues about one of the two secret sons - I picked up on these and felt pleased with myself, but totally failed to spot the clues to the other one.


Susan: The Mysterious Affair at Styles by Agatha Christie
Michaela: Crossed Skis by Carol Carnac (ECR Lorac)
Jill: The Verdict of 12 by Raymond W. Postgate
Jan: The Rasp by Philip MacDonald


Good question! I've only read the first chapter so far but will be interested to see how much the writers' styles differ.

Has anyone read much by him? I've only listened to some abridged stories with his railway detective Thorpe Hazell which Benedict Cumberbatch read on the radio, which were fun.
I also read Simon Brett's introduction, which was very interesting, and Dorothy L. Sayers's little introduction about how the authors worked.
She mentions that Chesterton's "picturesque preface" was added after the mystery was completed - I did quickly read this section but disliked it, as I'd remembered from my previous read. It has a lot of racial stereotypes, and it doesn't seem to have anything to do with the main story

For anyone just starting The Floating Admiral, my memory from last time around is that the introduction by Chesterton is rather off-putting and doesn't really have anything to do with the rest of the story, so if anyone finds that section a struggle I don't think you will lose much if you skim and move on.

Please only nominate books written and published in the Golden Age period, or a little earlier or later - if in doubt whether a title is eligible, please ask.
As usual, just one nomination per group member, and only one book by any individual writer can be nominated per month. Looking forward to seeing what everyone nominates.