Brian’s
Comments
(group member since Mar 02, 2009)
Brian’s
comments
from the fiction files redux group.
Showing 261-280 of 346

don't have much to add because so many good things have been harvested above but here's a couple of things... one related to the story one not so (maybe?)...
first the not so... the line Time, of course, topples everyone in its path equally - the way that driver beat his old horse until it died on the road. that line drove me crazy because i just read about a horse being beaten on the road and couldn't remember where... finally remembered... crime and punishment. it was just a trigger for me for two reasons; i just read the book last year and i thought that line was just a weird thing to throw out. was there an intended connection? considering my second point...
the one more directly related... aunt on his back... a monkey on somebody's back... a serious problem that will not go away. is that what this was about in some dreamy convoluted way? carrying a problem? carrying guilt?
i don't question murakami too much. i just prefer to share his dreams.

from an article about filipinos in phoenix... once a week there was a sort of like a filipino club... you couldn't actually call it a club, but it was. all the families got together at prince hall. they would rent the hall every saturday night and all of the family-- everybody -- went.
maybe there was something similar happening in la at that time...
i don't think it's racism... but then i haven't read the book and i'm not a filipino so i don't know shit.


chaos can be good... order can be confusing.

isn't that basically the storyline for all his books?
the thing i remember is not only were the chapters really short, and don't get me wrong i like short chapters and sentences and words, every chapter ended with a cliffhanger. the pace was furious. but i can't remember any of the ones i read... except there was always a crazy guy who took people. and i'm pretty sure i read at least his first 5 books.
i much prefer michael connelly's harry bosch series. he can actually write and he creates great characters even though his chapters are longer. he makes la sound exciting, sexy and dangerous... but then i guess it is.

A Wild Cossack Rides Into a Cultural Battle
“No, brothers, to love as the Russian soul loves is to love not with the mind or anything else, but with all that God has given, all that is within you.”

on the way to work this morning the moon was in my face, all big and round and bright. the sun wasn't up yet. it was just me and the moon. i pulled over to the side of the road and just watched the moon. it watched me back. we now understand each other.
i didn't pick up the big sleep though i did sleep well last night... that's a rare thing.


i've only read one of his books. i'm more familiar with the other murakami (ryu)... the one with ice picks and girls who like it rough. sorry. dan read a lot of this guy last year.



yeah... but this baby was nearly two years old before he was discovered and the metaphorical cord cut.


To start things off here's a little description...
Sheikh Khalid Bin Shareef has vowed never to get entangled with virgins. But innocent Maggie is too hard to resist—and he takes her…
The next morning she disappears. But Maggie is unfinished business, and he has her sent to his kingdom. There they discover the consequence of their night of passion.
Marriage is the only answer—but it must be one with no emotions, no expectations of love. Maggie will take her rightful place by the sheikh's side…and in his bed!
Sheik Ishmai has been compared to Steinbeck, Camus, Proust, Borges, Hemingway, Faulkner, Beckett, Disciple John, and Brown with the sparse, elegant language of Zerna Addis Sharp.
The opening paragraph...
See Sheikh Khalid. See Maggie. Jump, Sheikh, jump.


I'm reading Pamuk, an early one called [b:The New Life|861981..."
nah... he's just a good writer and father. the reviewers just can't find the right hole to peg him into.

I don't know that age has anything to do with whether something is..."literary" I guess is the term we're using. I think age has somethi..."
that's what i meant... the age of the reader, not the book. :)

i wonder if age has anything to do with it? when i was younger i wasted many a day on cheap thrills and fast page turners. i went through books like potato chips. throw a russian author at me and i would just laugh. my definition also would imply that what is literary fiction to me might be fluff to another, or vice-versa.

He's a happy guy.
