Aileth’s
Comments
(group member since Jan 03, 2014)
Aileth’s
comments
from the Everything Nerdy and Anything in Between group.
Showing 1-19 of 19

Check the post about the voting. We put out suggestions for readings in there. Honestly, right now I don't know if the next one has been chosen yet. I've been out of the loop for the past month.

It's a really good tour of the universe, one asteroid at a time.

http://www.epubbud.com/book.php?g=79G...
It has all 5 parts in it. We're only reading the first one.
If not, torrents are good, like David suggested. I got mine from there too.

Slaughterhouse Five;
Neverwhere;
The Colour of Magic;
Red Dragon;
The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy;
1984.
TL, name the day the poll ends.

Just tell me which books I add to the poll and I'll make it. And the dates for the poll to take place.



Doyle did it for money but he never really cared about his detective. When Sherlock Holmes became so prominent that papers wouldn't receive his works unless it was a Holmes story, he decided he needed to end the detective's life in order to get back his own. It didn't work, as we well know; the response was a massive outcry. His own mother wrote to him to bring the detective back! So he continued writing the detective into the eager readership's hands and eventually, after 10 years, had to bring him back. I'm guessing his mother had to do with that again. He was a big family man who had the worst luck in family survival rate: he lost his wife and son, 2 nephews, 3 brothers and his mother all in a span of 5 years.
I've been reading the Sherlock Holmes stories since I was little, and some on the life of Doyle. They were serialized in The Strand, which is why most are short stories. Doyle was good at creating a scenario and solving its puzzle. Although like you, I've often wondered about his deductive abilities being more of a parlor trick. Moffat himself has said Doyle's method was to work from the ending backwards in order to create the situation that lead to that conclusion, including the deductions themselves. But it's true that he used the latest scientific knowledge of the time to make the clues.
In this time of constant improvements and massive information onslaughter we don't realise how much impact having a character who used scientific facts to solve a crime created in the society of the time. We're so used to getting at least 20 shows a week that talk science gibberish that for us is a daily routine. In Victorian time it was a huge novelty. And thus Sherlock Holmes became the legend who paved the way for us to have at least 20 crime shows a week that talk science gibberish. That's why it's so popular and so important. And it's the character that became more prominent than the author.
I'm forgetting that the first person to use fingerprints for criminology in a story was Mark Twain's story Pudd'nhead Wilson.

Btw, if we read The Colour of Magic, we must read The Light Fantastic with it as they're both part of the same story.

The problem is the ozone layer. If it weren't for that disappearing, I'd say you're right. However, if this continues, it'll go straight to desert due to lack of protection.


http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/
It has all public works and then some.

All this means that both sides are having extreme weather and it's not such a good thing.


I've added one to learn how to do it and yes, the tag is there so I can use it.

I'll have to get Dostoyevski's book in my own language instead of in English or it'd be a double translation for me.

Question about THHGTTG: Do all five parts enter?