David’s
Comments
(group member since Dec 13, 2009)
David’s
comments
from the Science and Inquiry group.
Showing 161-180 of 1,040


Welcome to our group, Hamadullah! You have a wide range of interests--please feel free to post in our discussion threads!

This book looks excellent. However, it was published just a couple of weeks ago. We need to postpone this nomination for a few months, when it will be more widely available.

I agree, Matt. Popper's ideas about falsification are most important to the progress of science. The idea that a hypothesis can or cannot be falsified helps to determine whether or not it is a valid scientific concept.

Jessica, I have only a vague memory of Kuhn's book from reading it many years ago. But I think that the breakthrough paradigm shift is in the chapters you are about to read! In other words, slow scientific progress is gradual over many years, and once in a long while it is interrupted by a sudden paradigm shift that brings about whole new ways of thinking.
What brings about these sudden paradigm shifts? Usually it is due to new instrumentation or new observational tools that provide observational evidence that is inconsistent with the prevailing theories. At first, people will shrug off or explain away that evidence, until the new evidence becomes too pervasive, and stimulates new ideaas.
Jan 31, 2022 12:31PM

Yes, Avi Loeb did publish a peer-reviewed paper (and some non-peer-reviewed papers) on the subject. See below. However, there have also been several peer-reviewed papers by other scientists, both for and against this hypothesis. Obviously, this is a controversial subject!
Bialy, Shmuel; Loeb, Abraham (October 26, 2018). "Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?". The Astrophysical Journal. 868 (1): L1.
Loeb, Abraham (September 26, 2018). "How to Search for Dead Cosmic Civilizations". Scientific American. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
Loeb, Abraham (November 20, 2018). "6 Strange Facts about the Interstellar Visitor 'Oumuamua". Scientific American. Retrieved November 20, 2018.
Jan 31, 2022 07:25AM

Excellent question, Herman! The answer is yes, he wrote several peer-reviewed papers on the subject (see below). Of course, as you can imagine, there are also peer-reviewed papers that rebut Loeb's claims. Loeb's hypothesis is clearly controversial!
Loeb, Abraham (20 November 2018). "6 Strange Facts about the Interstellar Visitor 'Oumuamua". Scientific American. Archived from the original on 20 November 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
Bialy, Shmuel; Loeb, Abraham (October 26, 2018). "Could Solar Radiation Pressure Explain 'Oumuamua's Peculiar Acceleration?". The Astrophysical Journal. 868 (1): L1. arXiv:1810.11490. Bibcode:2018ApJ...868L...1B. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaeda8. S2CID 118956077.
Loeb, Abraham (September 26, 2018). "How to Search for Dead Cosmic Civilizations". Scientific American. Retrieved September 26, 2018.
Siraj, Amir; Loeb, Abraham (2019). "Identifying Interstellar Objects Trapped in the Solar System through Their Orbital Parameters". The Astrophysical Journal. 872 (1): L10.
Jan 23, 2022 10:55AM

Thanks for the recommendation Mark -- I've checked it out from the library!
Jan 20, 2022 11:06AM

Loeb claims that in 2017, our solar system was visited by an interstellar probe launched by an alien civilization. His evidence is rather persuasive! Here is my review.
Jan 20, 2022 09:51AM


Haha! Me too! I read this book many moons ago, as it was a textbook in a college class "Philosophy of Science". I don't remember much of it, either!

Jim, this is very true. It is the selective "P-Hacking" that causes a big bias in science articles. This is the argument that allows scientists to write the words "statistically significant".
It reminds me of a famous quote from Richard Feynman:
You know, the most amazing thing happened to me tonight... I saw a car with the license plate ARW 357. Can you imagine? Of all the millions of license plates in the state, what was the chance that I would see that particular one tonight? Amazing!
Finding correlations or results "after-the-fact", that is formulating a hypothesis after conducting an experiment can invalidate the conclusions of the experiment!

Steve, your negative comments really got to me. I agree with you--the people who might benefit from the book won't read it, and those who want to improve their bullshit will read and study it!

It's not the native intelligence of the people, but the political conditions, where dissent is tolerated, that progress is made. The encouragement of dissent seems to enhance creativity.

Life's Edge: The Search for What It Means to Be Alive is a very good book. We read it in September, 2021. Here is our book discussion.

We read this book back in September 2012. Here is a link to our discussion:
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I will be honest--I didn't care for this book much. Here is my review.


I learned a while ago, about the so-called "secretary problem". You want to interview a number of candidates, but you must hire a candidate on the spot--you cannot go back to an earlier candidate. The solution is if you have N candidates, you should interview the first N/e candidates, and then after that, you should immediately hire the next one who is equal or better than all the previous ones.
This problem is not just about hiring secretaries. You can use it for any selection process; finding a spouse, a home, or anything else.
I just found an article that describes why the natural exponent finds itself in so many interesting problems:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/why-eu...
Why e, the Transcendental Math Constant, Is Just the Best by Pradeep Mutalik, in the online Quanta Magazine. If you are mathematically inclined, it is worth reading.

