Joe’s
Comments
(group member since Jul 28, 2020)
Joe’s
comments
from the Existential Book Club - Tempe, AZ group.
Showing 1-7 of 7

Our group read the Plague and the Fall last year; two of my very favorite novels. While I agree with you that Myth of Sisyphus is an eloquent explanation of Absurdity in human life, reading it still gives me problems. The consensus of the group Sunday was that Camus was a better novelist than philosopher.
Since he starts out criticizing his contemporary Existentialists one is tempted to regard this as a philosophical essay. But his arguments are specious, his portrayals of Husserl and SK mostly strawmen. If I change my perspective and regard his Myth more like SK's Point of View for my Work as an Author, I get much more out of it.
I tend to think of Camus in relation to his contemporary psychologists. Freud explained man's existence with his Will to Pleasure, Adler channeled Nietzsche's Will to Power, and Victor Frankl explained our Will to Meaning. I tend to think of Camus' answer to absurdity as a natural extension of Frankl in Man's Search for Meaning.
Frankl was not aiming for some transcendent meaning of Life, although some people can find meaning in religion. Frankl wrote about finding meaning in every moment of every day; in the courage to face life in spite of the ever present certainty that we all end up on the same dust heap.
If you haven't already read it, I strongly recommend Sarah Bakewell's At the Existentialist Cafe (2016). It really helped me to understand Camus's relation to Sartre and de Beauvoir.
Hope you can make it to the next book club.


