230 books
—
57 voters
“
It’s actually funny that science lays claim to randomness since no one has ever seen a random event. Scientists interpret events as random rather than causal because of their dogmatic ideology. Their paradigm forbids them from referring to unobservable causal processes – implying a reality more fundamental than science which science cannot penetrate – but accepts randomness, as the least threat to science’s supremacy, even though, in Hume’s terms, randomness is no more empirical than causation,
...more
”
― Universals Versus Particulars: The Ultimate Intellectual War
― Universals Versus Particulars: The Ultimate Intellectual War
“
No random event has ever been empirically demonstrated. Events have been observed which have been interpreted as being based on randomness, but this is merely an inference, and rationalists can advance totally different inferences that never once refer to randomness.
”
― Universals Versus Particulars: The Ultimate Intellectual War
― Universals Versus Particulars: The Ultimate Intellectual War
