Sharon’s answer to “Why do you think Grisham had to go into so much detail about the war story? I don’t think it really…” > Likes and Comments
1 like · Like
I thought the second part was redundant. Grishom had already pretty much outlined Pete's war experience during the trail so why did he had to go back and fill in the details? Also I did not like the blah ending I thought it would be something thought provoking and unusual but it was the same old same old.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Robin
(new)
Jan 02, 2019 05:52PM
I thought the second part was redundant. Grishom had already pretty much outlined Pete's war experience during the trail so why did he had to go back and fill in the details? Also I did not like the blah ending I thought it would be something thought provoking and unusual but it was the same old same old.
reply
|
flag
