☘Misericordia☘’s answer to “I have read this book and re-read it twice, am i missing the big twist at the end? I don't understa…” > Likes and Comments
3 likes · Like
And while I'm at spoiling, Claire might have planned to drive Amber to kill her. Otherwise, how would she have survived?
Aaaand, the idea to kill Claire's birth parents was Ambers'. And it was documented in Claire's diaries.
So there are 2 major twists on the last pages.
But Madeline is on trial for a double murder, Claire's dead.
Madeline did not murder anyone. And who sent the necklace, if not Claire?
No, she didn't but Amber framed her. My point was she was on trial for 2 murders, Claire and David. I have no idea where the bracelet came from...
Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets. Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.
What are you talking about? There’s no necklace; just the bracelet.
Yes, Rhinnan, if you kindly reread, I already wrote 'Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets.' I don't really like or distinguish all that jewellery :)
This is what you wrote in the comment above mine, to which I was referring: “Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.”
Dear Rhi, I wrote afterwards:
Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets. Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.
Jan 31, 2018 07:38PM
Yes but after correcting yourself, you then repeated the word “necklace,” so it was a little confusing.
Adding to the plot! Lol!
Ok :) Now I get where the confusion is from :) Well, I'm sort of distracted lately :)
I think Madeline sent the necklace as a warning that she knows she was set up
@terry a. there’s no necklace in this story; b. there’s no Madeline in this story.
ok, sorry i don't have the book in front of me...the bracelet the girls shared, not necklace, and the godmother..maidaline? sorry, still don't have the book in front of me, but the one who was framed for murdering Claire
Sharon-where does it say that Madeline was on trial for a double murder. I only read that she was on trial for murder.
@rhinnan what are you taking about? Yes, there is a Madeline in this story and she’s alive and on trial for murder when the Amber receives the bracelet.
Melissa, you’re right. I just remember her by her last name, Frost.
If she Madeleine Frost weren't on trial for a double murder, that would mean Claire was still alive and could TELL everyone that it was Amber who set the house on fire.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
☘Misericordia☘
(new)
Dec 01, 2017 01:13PM
And while I'm at spoiling, Claire might have planned to drive Amber to kill her. Otherwise, how would she have survived?
reply
|
flag
Aaaand, the idea to kill Claire's birth parents was Ambers'. And it was documented in Claire's diaries.
So there are 2 major twists on the last pages.
But Madeline is on trial for a double murder, Claire's dead.
Madeline did not murder anyone. And who sent the necklace, if not Claire?
No, she didn't but Amber framed her. My point was she was on trial for 2 murders, Claire and David. I have no idea where the bracelet came from...
Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets. Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.
What are you talking about? There’s no necklace; just the bracelet.
Yes, Rhinnan, if you kindly reread, I already wrote 'Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets.' I don't really like or distinguish all that jewellery :)
This is what you wrote in the comment above mine, to which I was referring: “Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.”
Dear Rhi, I wrote afterwards:Yeah, it was bracelet not necklace. I mixed up the trinkets. Well, I believed that the necklace has something to do with the suuposedly dead sis.
Jan 31, 2018 07:38PM
Yes but after correcting yourself, you then repeated the word “necklace,” so it was a little confusing. Adding to the plot! Lol!
Ok :) Now I get where the confusion is from :) Well, I'm sort of distracted lately :)
I think Madeline sent the necklace as a warning that she knows she was set up
@terry a. there’s no necklace in this story; b. there’s no Madeline in this story.
ok, sorry i don't have the book in front of me...the bracelet the girls shared, not necklace, and the godmother..maidaline? sorry, still don't have the book in front of me, but the one who was framed for murdering Claire
Sharon-where does it say that Madeline was on trial for a double murder. I only read that she was on trial for murder.
@rhinnan what are you taking about? Yes, there is a Madeline in this story and she’s alive and on trial for murder when the Amber receives the bracelet.
Melissa, you’re right. I just remember her by her last name, Frost.
If she Madeleine Frost weren't on trial for a double murder, that would mean Claire was still alive and could TELL everyone that it was Amber who set the house on fire.
