A'len’s answer to “Im somewhere within the first 50 pages of the book and it has been kind of hard to get through. Doe…” > Likes and Comments
8 likes · Like
The book does pick up its the best book ive ever read
Then I would strongly suggest you read more. I mean dear god, the man uses phrases like 'the DAWNLESS morning." That's not POSSIBLE, there is no such thing as a dawnless morning. Dawn IS morning, morning IS dawn. The two words mean the exact same thing. The idiot meant to imply a morning with no visible sun, I assume, but he got it horribly, horribly wrong.
The point? Paolini, aside from being derivative as hell, is a terrible writer. He has no voice of his own because he's trying too hard to sound 'kool'. And yes, I spelled that with a 'k' on purpose. You guess why, I'm too lazy to explain the humor.
Paolini strains so hard to sound poetic that whenever I picture him in my head I see a person who looks to be suffering from extreme constipation clutching a pen in his fist as he struggles to come up with some poorly composed bit of drivel in his desperation to sound like authors who actually DO have a right to be called wordsmiths. Paolini is not a wordsmith. He's a wordsmangler.
To A'len: Well he was also a teenager and still kidish. A dawnless morning is a thing. Dawn is the part of daybreak where the sunn first shines through,it was DREARY and BLAND not a BEAUTIFUL DAYBREAK. daybrake is morning not dawn. I should know with my countless mornings of watching the day break. so realy, who is trying to be over poetic, instead of talking down to someone, maybe you should look in a mirror.
To A'len: And that's where your wrong. A dawnless morning is a morning WHERE THERE IS NO DAWN. What he is trying to say there is that THE SUN NEVER ROSE. Think through what you say before you say it.
To SilverEnder: I agree completely with you. I don't understand why there are to many haters of this book
I really don't understand this complaint. The first part of the book is a bit slow, yes, but you only really would think the rest of the book was slow if you were determined to hate this book and read every word thinking about how much this book is horrible and terrible and slow and badbadBAD. Then again, The Cat in the Hat would be slow and boring with that kind of attitude.
back to top
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Brandi
(new)
Sep 30, 2014 08:33AM

reply
|
flag

The point? Paolini, aside from being derivative as hell, is a terrible writer. He has no voice of his own because he's trying too hard to sound 'kool'. And yes, I spelled that with a 'k' on purpose. You guess why, I'm too lazy to explain the humor.
Paolini strains so hard to sound poetic that whenever I picture him in my head I see a person who looks to be suffering from extreme constipation clutching a pen in his fist as he struggles to come up with some poorly composed bit of drivel in his desperation to sound like authors who actually DO have a right to be called wordsmiths. Paolini is not a wordsmith. He's a wordsmangler.


To SilverEnder: I agree completely with you. I don't understand why there are to many haters of this book
