Devanshi’s answer to “1. I did not see the whole point why Sita who was accepted by the Malayaputras(The deciding authori…” > Likes and Comments
4 likes · Like
Amish could have done a complete re-imagining of the Ramayana and would have had the freedom to write as he pleased. This whole series feels like compulsion from the publisher that the author rather than Amish's personal interest. The Ramayana is a fictional representation of events of a certain time. Any modern author can rewrite it as they want. It takes imagination and courage - but both Amish and the publisher decided to play it safe.
i dont think so. Amish has took liberarty as he want. His soul purpose was focused on that "Vishnu must be chosen on action not by authorites"Thats what maryada pusotam means. Moreover Sita honest love for ram after Malayputras planed to give him exile has change everything in second book
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Sunanda
(new)
Jul 12, 2017 01:41AM
Amish could have done a complete re-imagining of the Ramayana and would have had the freedom to write as he pleased. This whole series feels like compulsion from the publisher that the author rather than Amish's personal interest. The Ramayana is a fictional representation of events of a certain time. Any modern author can rewrite it as they want. It takes imagination and courage - but both Amish and the publisher decided to play it safe.
reply
|
flag
i dont think so. Amish has took liberarty as he want. His soul purpose was focused on that "Vishnu must be chosen on action not by authorites"Thats what maryada pusotam means. Moreover Sita honest love for ram after Malayputras planed to give him exile has change everything in second book
