Melissa’s answer to “How can we take this book seriously following this scathing critique? https://www.theguardian.com/b…” > Likes and Comments
7 likes · Like
No it's not. The review is too kind to Ohler. His misstatements and deliberate confusions as to the timeline of events is repeated, his constant shifting of topic is the SOP of revisionists, his contradictions from chapter to chapter are red flags as to the inaccuracy of his contentions... it's all just a mess and cannot withstand serious investigation. Even David Irving, who released a book titled 'The Secret Diaries of Hitler's Doctor' didn't go so far as Ohler about the issue of narcotic dependency in Hitler nor in Morell's part in making that addiction happen. I could tear this book down chapter by chapter to point out the lies and distortions, it's so bad.
back to top
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
C. G.
(new)
Mar 17, 2021 03:03PM
No it's not. The review is too kind to Ohler. His misstatements and deliberate confusions as to the timeline of events is repeated, his constant shifting of topic is the SOP of revisionists, his contradictions from chapter to chapter are red flags as to the inaccuracy of his contentions... it's all just a mess and cannot withstand serious investigation. Even David Irving, who released a book titled 'The Secret Diaries of Hitler's Doctor' didn't go so far as Ohler about the issue of narcotic dependency in Hitler nor in Morell's part in making that addiction happen. I could tear this book down chapter by chapter to point out the lies and distortions, it's so bad.
reply
|
flag
